Natasha,
I agree that this is unclear. Barry proposed (6-9) in his email from
March 19th without going into the specifics. (01)
Barry, could you clarify what you mean?
Thanks
Fabian (02)
On Mar 31, 2008, at 6:58 PM, Natasha Noy wrote: (03)
> One more question
>
>> == Summary: Gatekeeping/ Minimal Requirements ==
>>
>> 1. Openness (see below)
>> 2. /The ontology is expressed in a formal language with a well-
>> defined
>> syntax./
>> 3. /The authors of the ontology provide the required metadata. /
>> 4. /The ontology has a clearly specified and clearly delineated
>> scope.
>> /5. /Successive versions of an ontology are clearly identified.
>> /6. /The ontology has passed certain dynamic tests. /
>> 7. /The ontology has unique IDs for its terms. /
>> 8. /The ontology is adequately labeled. /
>> 9. /The ontology has a plurality of users.
>> /
>
> On #8: What does "adequately labeled" mean here? I couldn't find a
> discussion of this item. Can you clarify, please?
>
> Thanks a lot!
>
> Natasha
>
>
>
> _________________________________________________________________
> Msg Archives: http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/ontology-summit/
> Subscribe/Config: http://ontolog.cim3.net/mailman/listinfo/ontology-summit/
> Unsubscribe: mailto:ontology-summit-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Community Files: http://ontolog.cim3.net/file/work/OntologySummit2008/
> Community Wiki: http://ontolog.cim3.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?OntologySummit2008
> Community Portal: http://ontolog.cim3.net/ (04)
_________________________________________________________________
Msg Archives: http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/ontology-summit/
Subscribe/Config: http://ontolog.cim3.net/mailman/listinfo/ontology-summit/
Unsubscribe: mailto:ontology-summit-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Community Files: http://ontolog.cim3.net/file/work/OntologySummit2008/
Community Wiki: http://ontolog.cim3.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?OntologySummit2008
Community Portal: http://ontolog.cim3.net/ (05)
|