ontology-summit
[Top] [All Lists]

[ontology-summit] categorizing "ontology"

To: <ontology-summit@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
From: "Teller, Jacob" <jteller@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 18 Jan 2007 14:31:11 -0500
Message-id: <0D530D61D3B4CE42BD6EA146DDB8C7B689926D@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

Suppose there existed a meta model of “Ontology” that created and linked all of the atomic structures that an ontology  could/should have according to the consensus of the Ontolog community.  Then this meta-model would be capable of having mappings to all of those local “Ontologies” that are in reality thesauri, or conceptual models, or taxonomies, or use cases, etc.  These mappings would clearly show what is and IS NOT included in the local offering and this then becomes a relatively straightforward set of comparison points for what one is referring to as “I have an Ontology.”

 

Jacob A. Teller

      Senior Scientist

NCI Information Systems, Inc.

10010 Junction Drive,  Suite 202,

 Annapolis Junction, MSD 20701

jteller@xxxxxxxxx   301 939-4404

 


This email transmission contains information from NCI Information Systems, Inc. that may be considered privileged or confidential and is intended solely for the named recipient.  If you have received this message in error, please contact the sender immediately and be aware that the use, copying or dissemination of this information is prohibited.


_________________________________________________________________
Msg Archives: http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/ontology-summit/ 
Subscribe/Config: http://ontolog.cim3.net/mailman/listinfo/ontology-summit/  
Unsubscribe: mailto:ontology-summit-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Community Files: http://ontolog.cim3.net/file/work/OntologySummit2007/
Community Wiki: http://ontolog.cim3.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?OntologySummit2007
Community Portal: http://ontolog.cim3.net/    (01)
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>