To: | ontology-based-standards <ontology-based-standards@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
---|---|
From: | Alex Shkotin <alex.shkotin@xxxxxxxxx> |
Date: | Sat, 19 Oct 2013 10:42:00 +0400 |
Message-id: | <CAFxxROQ_a6qecDCxGm3qXoT6fXUn64e31JqQuobhy2Ydjk3vpg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
Simon, This is why it's easer to formalize particular science (hydrology and hydrodynamics separatly;-) as concepts in particular science are more or less aligned and carefuly defined.
We have tried formalization for petrology keeping OWL2-DL in mind. Glimpse "Towards Owl-Based Knowledge Representation in Petrology" article or presentation.
Alex 2013/10/19 <Simon.Cox@xxxxxxxx>
_________________________________________________________________ Message Archives: http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/ontology-based-standards/ Subscribe: mailto:ontology-based-standards-join@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Config/Unsubscribe: http://ontolog.cim3.net/mailman/listinfo/ontology-based-standards/ Shared Files: http://ontolog.cim3.net/file/work/OntologyBasedStandards/ Wiki: http://ontolog.cim3.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?OntologyBasedStandards (01) |