Hi everyone, (01)
Thanks, Denise for doing this extraction! I will be able to look at it later in
the week.
Unfortunately I don't know of any crawlers. I also have a meeting conflict
(10:30-12 PST) this
Thursday. (02)
:) Lisa (03)
--- Bob Smith <Bob@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: (04)
> Hi Denise,
>
> Thanks!
>
> Your plans for next steps sounds reasonable to me;
>
> - I do not have immediate access to a crawler but I will check with a friend
> at Kayvium about the status of his software.
>
> - Lisa, Peter: any comments?
>
> Cheers,
>
> Bob
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: dbedford@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:dbedford@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]
> Sent: Monday, May 15, 2006 7:38 AM
> To: Peter P. Yim; Bob Smith; Lisa
> Subject: Ontolog Wiki Inventory
>
> All,
>
> Attached (at long last) is an inventory of the content of the Ontolog Wiki
> down to Level 6 in the tree structure. (See attached file: Ontolog Wiki
> Site Map.zip). The Ontology tree actually goes down 23 levels - across the
> full site
> - but after running the full scan it seemed that most of the content was at
> level 6 or above.
>
> It is about 15m, so I zipped it to get through any size ceilings you might
> have on your email. As it turns out the file is too large for the list so
> I'm sending it to your direct email addresses.
>
> Here's how to reach the contents of the inventory:
>
> Column A = path to the file
> Column B = File Name
> Column C = File Extension/Type
> Column D = Title if there is one available Column E = Author where available
> Column F = Last Modified Date Column G = File Size Column H = downloading
> speed (we use this to check for slow pages/content) Column I = Outbound Link
> Column J = External Links
>
> Suggested next steps:
>
> the team - Lisa especially - reviews the inventory to decide what kinds
> of
> content we will cover in our ontologizing exercise
> we make a copy of the inventory wihch reflects our selections, and
> extract
> the content to be ontologized from the wiki. Bob or Lisa - do you know
> of a
> crawler we could use to collect the content? If not, I can do this but
> it
> might take me a bit longer since I'll have to work at it in bits/pieces
> of
> time or ask a colleague here to recommend a tool;
> store the content in a directory - Peter do you think you could create
> the
> directory for us to work from?
> once we have the actual content in one/more directories, I'll proceed to
> run
> the concept extraction and build the categorizer, summarizer
>
> Does this sound like a plan? Please let me know if you want me to run the
> scan
> deeper - Peter can probably tell at a glance what is missing from the
> inventory.
>
> Best regards,
> Denise
>
>
> (05)
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com (06)
_________________________________________________________________
Msg Archives: http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/ontologizing/
Subscribe/Unsubscribe/Config:
http://ontolog.cim3.net/mailman/listinfo/ontologizing/
Community Portal: http://ontolog.cim3.net/
Community Files: http://ontolog.cim3.net/file/work/OntologizingOntolog/
Community Wiki: http://ontolog.cim3.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?OntologizingOntolog (07)
|