ontolog-forum
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [ontolog-forum] Need advice

To: "[ontolog-forum]" <ontolog-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
From: Cristian vasquez <cristianvasquez@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 13 Dec 2014 02:03:20 +0100
Message-id: <xdujfxiso0kh4f12mwgvotlf.1418432600840@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>



Enviado de Samsung Mobile+ j'y je, dkk
K


-------- Mensaje original --------
De: "Barkmeyer, Edward J"
Fecha:12/13/2014 12:11 AM (GMT+01:00)
Para: "[ontolog-forum]"
Asunto: Re: [ontolog-forum] Need advice

Duane,

 

INVERSE is the term used in OWL and EXPRESS.  Nijssen and the SBVR lot refer to ‘alternative readings’ and ‘synonymous forms’, seeing both of these as astatements about a single ‘relationship’.  OWL sees two ‘properties’ that are related by an ‘InverseProperty’ axiom.   UML sees one a oa‘association’ with two ‘properties’, but does not provide a term for the relationship between the properties per se.  EXPRESS says there is one ‘relationship’ created by two ‘attributes’, one of which is the INVERSE of the other.

 

-Ed

 

From: ontolog-forum-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:ontolog-forum-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Duane Nickull
Sent: Friday, December 12, 2014 6:02 PM
To: [ontolog-forum]
Subject: [ontolog-forum] Need advice

 

What would be a suitable term to call a binary relationship that is co-dependent yet not symmetrical to another relationship between the same entity in a binary relationship?  

 

If "John is a father of Chris”, how can we describe that relationship in terms of comparing it to “Chris is a son of John”?  Would “isomorphic”  be the best term to use? “Inverse”? Assume that the relationship is traversable from either side.

 

The context of this is in a graph database discussion group.  Graph Databases have nodes and relationships.  Either can have properties.  Unlike RDBMS systems, graph databases have relationships between instances of nodes, not a foreign key relationship with an entire table.

 

The binary relationship is not symmetric since true symmetry would require that the statements “..is a father of…” and “…is a son of…” be equally true for A-B as they are for B-A.

 

Sorry for this simple request.  I am just trying to find the best description for this.

 

Duane Nickull

******************************

CTO - Hot Tomali/Cientis/Cheddar Labs

 

NOTICE: This e-mail and any attachments may contain confidential information. If you are the intended recipient, please consider this a privileged communication, not to be forwarded without explicit approval from the sender.  If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately by return e-mail, delete this e-mail and destroy any copies. Any dissemination or use of this information by a person other than the intended recipient is unauthorized and may be illegal. The originator reserves the right to monitor all e-mail communications through its networks for quality control purposes.


_________________________________________________________________
Message Archives: http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/ontolog-forum/  
Config Subscr: http://ontolog.cim3.net/mailman/listinfo/ontolog-forum/  
Unsubscribe: mailto:ontolog-forum-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Shared Files: http://ontolog.cim3.net/file/
Community Wiki: http://ontolog.cim3.net/wiki/ 
To join: http://ontolog.cim3.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?WikiHomePage#nid1J    (01)

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>