[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [ontolog-forum] Types of Formal (logical) Definitions in ontology

To: "[ontolog-forum]" <ontolog-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
From: rrovetto@xxxxxxxxxxx
Date: Sat, 5 Jul 2014 08:51:43 -0400
Message-id: <CADM4J9y9258YTuDr-dHRpgwwfN7jWniecqdsgLpZ32DC0R3zyQ@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
In spite of natural language having quantifier words and syll & FOL based on that, as JS mentioned (if I understood correctly), and based on what's been said thus far, then it's possible to create non-FOL, non-syllogistic logics, correct? And are logics without quantifiers doable?

Message Archives: http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/ontolog-forum/  
Config Subscr: http://ontolog.cim3.net/mailman/listinfo/ontolog-forum/  
Unsubscribe: mailto:ontolog-forum-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Shared Files: http://ontolog.cim3.net/file/
Community Wiki: http://ontolog.cim3.net/wiki/ 
To join: http://ontolog.cim3.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?WikiHomePage#nid1J    (01)

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>