| To: | "[ontolog-forum]" <ontolog-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> | 
|---|---|
| From: | rrovetto@xxxxxxxxxxx | 
| Date: | Sat, 5 Jul 2014 08:51:43 -0400 | 
| Message-id: | <CADM4J9y9258YTuDr-dHRpgwwfN7jWniecqdsgLpZ32DC0R3zyQ@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> | 
| In spite of natural language having quantifier words and syll & FOL based on that, as JS mentioned (if I understood correctly), and based on what's been said thus far, then it's possible to create non-FOL, non-syllogistic logics, correct? And are logics without quantifiers doable? _________________________________________________________________ Message Archives: http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/ontolog-forum/ Config Subscr: http://ontolog.cim3.net/mailman/listinfo/ontolog-forum/ Unsubscribe: mailto:ontolog-forum-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Shared Files: http://ontolog.cim3.net/file/ Community Wiki: http://ontolog.cim3.net/wiki/ To join: http://ontolog.cim3.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?WikiHomePage#nid1J (01) | 
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> | 
|---|---|---|
| 
 
 | ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [ontolog-forum] Types of Formal (logical) Definitions in ontology, John F Sowa | 
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [ontolog-forum] Patent application for using a formal ontology in NLP, Rich Cooper | 
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [ontolog-forum] Types of Formal (logical) Definitions in ontology, John F Sowa | 
| Next by Thread: | Re: [ontolog-forum] Types of Formal (logical) Definitions in ontology, John F Sowa | 
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |