| To: | "[ontolog-forum]" <ontolog-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| From: | Simon Spero <sesuncedu@xxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Sat, 2 Nov 2013 22:38:27 -0400 |
| Message-id: | <CADE8KM4LXcfABVesn5mb9k_UdLkNG5krYaG6KtfFbzM0ffteQA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|
On Nov 2, 2013 8:13 PM, "John McClure" <jmcclure@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > It seems to be that ontologists have no idea how to describe prepositional properties, and are therefore directly opposed to them in practice. Videri, quam esse. http://www.issco.unige.ch/working-papers/Hayes-1978-35.pdf _________________________________________________________________ Message Archives: http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/ontolog-forum/ Config Subscr: http://ontolog.cim3.net/mailman/listinfo/ontolog-forum/ Unsubscribe: mailto:ontolog-forum-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Shared Files: http://ontolog.cim3.net/file/ Community Wiki: http://ontolog.cim3.net/wiki/ To join: http://ontolog.cim3.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?WikiHomePage#nid1J (01) |
| Previous by Date: | Re: [ontolog-forum] Computer science ontology vs. philosophical ontology again, Pavithra |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [ontolog-forum] Computer science ontology vs. philosophical ontology again, Simon Spero |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [ontolog-forum] Computer science ontology vs. philosophical ontology again, John McClure |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [ontolog-forum] Computer science ontology vs. philosophical ontology again, John F Sowa |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |