ontolog-forum
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [ontolog-forum] Ontologies about social and psychological issues

To: "[ontolog-forum]" <ontolog-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
From: Yu Lin <linikujp@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 13 Oct 2013 11:13:25 -0400
Message-id: <CADBWCHZSaxe_FrSJPUdTB1mB-ZPiz0KjuUsC4ZPnWLbm0zYGXg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
We need such ontologies.
Where is the ontology?

Best,
Asiyah Yu Lin




################################################
There is no emotion, there is peace.
There is no ignorance, there is knowledge.
There is no passion, there is serenity.
There is no chaos, there is harmony.



On Fri, Oct 11, 2013 at 7:42 PM, Paul Tyson <phtyson@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Fri, 2013-10-11 at 12:19 -0400, John F Sowa wrote:
> In the bad old days, behaviorists prohibited any mention of internal
> processes in the brain, because they were unobservable. But brain scans,
> especially fMRI, provide direct evidence of the correlations between
> observable behavior and neural processes.
>
> The new methods have revolutionized cognitive science.  They make it
> respectable to define ontologies and scientific theories that refer
> to previously unobservable processes.
>
> Gregory Berns, who has a PhD and an MD, has published research articles
> on neuroscience and popular articles about their implications.  He is
> also a dog owner.  With the help of a professional dog trainer, Berns
> trained his own dog Callie and a few others to feel comfortable in
> an MRI scanner.  The dogs climb into it willingly.
>
> Then the researchers perform fMRI scans on the dogs while they are
> conscious.  Researches can then detect and analyze correlations
> among the stimuli, responses, and neural processes of the dogs.
>
> Berns published a popular article, "Dogs are people, too":
>
> http://www.nytimes.com/2013/10/06/opinion/sunday/dogs-are-people-too.html
>
> The question whether dogs are people is debatable. But the implications
> for cognitive science are clear:  neural processes in humans and other
> animals are observable.  That makes it legitimate to use existential
> quantifiers to refer to neural processes and to their implications
> and correlations with all forms of behavior -- including language.
>
> That kind of evidence is important for ontologies about intentions,
> emotions, and other social and psychological issues.

I can't wait to see that:

fmri:patch-of-red-here owl:sameAs hum:Happiness .
fmri:patch-of-blue-there owl:sameAs hum:Love .

Etc., etc. All mysteries solved.

Regards,
--Paul


_________________________________________________________________
Message Archives: http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/ontolog-forum/  
Config Subscr: http://ontolog.cim3.net/mailman/listinfo/ontolog-forum/  
Unsubscribe: mailto:ontolog-forum-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Shared Files: http://ontolog.cim3.net/file/
Community Wiki: http://ontolog.cim3.net/wiki/ 
To join: http://ontolog.cim3.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?WikiHomePage#nid1J    (01)

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>