|From:||William Frank <williamf.frank@xxxxxxxxx>|
|Date:||Sun, 9 Jun 2013 19:53:59 -0400|
On Sun, Jun 9, 2013 at 7:04 PM, Przemyslaw Jaskierski <przemjaskier@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
I would like help with this. Is this considered good practice in Protege-OWL?
Doe this modelling approach encourage defining the attributes of things as subtypes?
For example, we also have votes cast absentee and votes cast in person? votes cast during the day and votes cast during the night. are these more subtypes of votes?
What is the benefit to be had of using subtyping for this purpose?
It appears to me, from the Wine tutorial, that it does encourage this. I just don't understand what you can do by having positive votes and negative votes be different types of things, rather than the same type of thing with a different attribute value.
I can see from the below that it surely adds complexity, this plethora of 'types'.
_________________________________________________________________ Message Archives: http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/ontolog-forum/ Config Subscr: http://ontolog.cim3.net/mailman/listinfo/ontolog-forum/ Unsubscribe: mailto:ontolog-forum-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Shared Files: http://ontolog.cim3.net/file/ Community Wiki: http://ontolog.cim3.net/wiki/ To join: http://ontolog.cim3.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?WikiHomePage#nid1J (01)
|<Prev in Thread]||Current Thread||[Next in Thread>|
|Previous by Date:||[ontolog-forum] Strange problem with cardinality restrictions, Przemyslaw Jaskierski|
|Next by Date:||Re: [ontolog-forum] Laws: physical and social, Pat Hayes|
|Previous by Thread:||[ontolog-forum] Strange problem with cardinality restrictions, Przemyslaw Jaskierski|
|Next by Thread:||Re: [ontolog-forum] Strange problem with cardinality restrictions, John F Sowa|
|Indexes:||[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]|