>From what I said I did nor require that such a schema be "globally consistent
>normative," only that *a* schema could be written down. (01)
Steven (02)
On Feb 19, 2013, at 7:41 AM, John F Sowa <sowa@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: (03)
> SEZ
>> including SAP R3/R4, Oracle, operating systems, compilers, interpreters
>> and numerous application programs of one form or another.
>
> I certainly agree that none of those systems would have a single schema
> (i.e., globally consistent normative ontology) for all components. (04)
_________________________________________________________________
Message Archives: http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/ontolog-forum/
Config Subscr: http://ontolog.cim3.net/mailman/listinfo/ontolog-forum/
Unsubscribe: mailto:ontolog-forum-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Shared Files: http://ontolog.cim3.net/file/
Community Wiki: http://ontolog.cim3.net/wiki/
To join: http://ontolog.cim3.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?WikiHomePage#nid1J (05)
|