To: | doug@xxxxxxxxxx, "[ontolog-forum]" <ontolog-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
---|---|
From: | Simon Spero <sesuncedu@xxxxxxxxx> |
Date: | Fri, 18 May 2012 16:38:14 -0400 |
Message-id: | <CADE8KM6JoTU_Fzh1hP7R7AopoMV6iePPU-9=bsWbtzin3uONBA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
On Fri, May 18, 2012 at 3:52 PM, doug foxvog <doug@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:I suggest that states require that all submissions of trademarks for scents be made electronically. This would require that an ontology This problem has been investigated in the classification literature; I remember seeing a description for one such scheme described in a late 50's/early 60's issue of Aslib. A lot of the early CRG members worked for, or had a background in, chemistry and chemical engineering. For example, Brian Vickery, who was mostly responsible for the reception of faceted classification into the English language, was employed by ICI (Imperial Chemical Industries), where his job title was The Librarian of Butterwick.
Simon _________________________________________________________________ Message Archives: http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/ontolog-forum/ Config Subscr: http://ontolog.cim3.net/mailman/listinfo/ontolog-forum/ Unsubscribe: mailto:ontolog-forum-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Shared Files: http://ontolog.cim3.net/file/ Community Wiki: http://ontolog.cim3.net/wiki/ To join: http://ontolog.cim3.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?WikiHomePage#nid1J (01) |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: [ontolog-forum] The symbol triangle, revised, doug foxvog |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [ontolog-forum] FW: Google Knowledge Graph, Tom Knorr |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [ontolog-forum] The symbol triangle, revised, doug foxvog |
Next by Thread: | [ontolog-forum] AUTO: I am out of office (returning 18/05/2012), Henry Broodney |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |