[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [ontolog-forum] GOFO vs alarmism and defaitism (again)

To: "[ontolog-forum]" <ontolog-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
From: Wacek Kusnierczyk <waku@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 14 Feb 2011 09:36:55 -0600
Message-id: <4D594C17.30209@xxxxxxxxxxx>
On 2/14/11 9:06 AM, Pierre Grenon wrote:
> Try as I may, I seem to fail to elicit the original point and its cogency.
> On Mon, Feb 14, 2011 at 2:15 PM, Krzysztof Janowicz<jano@xxxxxxx>  wrote:
>> On 02/14/2011 01:55 AM, John F. Sowa wrote:
>>> But a top-down, monolithic, detailed, universal ontology of everything
> by the time it has become detailed and, also, an ontology of
> everything, does it still make sense to call it top-down? What exactly
> is being referred to here?
>>> is not only impossible to achieve,
> The nature of the alleged impossibility is unclear and the various
> characteristics do not seem particularly well on a par as prospective
> causes.    (01)

Bet Dirac was told many a time that electrons cannot be described 
consistently both in terms of special relativity and quantum mechanics. 
(Not sure he was told it would be a disaster if he succeeded.)    (02)

vQ    (03)

Message Archives: http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/ontolog-forum/  
Config Subscr: http://ontolog.cim3.net/mailman/listinfo/ontolog-forum/  
Unsubscribe: mailto:ontolog-forum-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Shared Files: http://ontolog.cim3.net/file/
Community Wiki: http://ontolog.cim3.net/wiki/ 
To join: http://ontolog.cim3.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?WikiHomePage#nid1J
To Post: mailto:ontolog-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx    (04)

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>