On Thu, November 11, 2010 8:17, Pavithra said:
> Dr Sowa: Your
existential graphs graph paper had the following:
>>this means "Some man eats a man".
> First of all it is a eerie statement to read. It is not normal to
> eat another man unless he is a cannibal.
Note that it says "Some man eats", not "Most men eat". The statement
does not say that this is a normal occurrence, just that it has happened
at least once.
Note that members of the Donner party who were starving to death ended
up eating colleagues who had already died, so that they would not also
die. They were not cannibals before this occurred, but were forced
into that status if they wanted to live.
> Cannibals are not logical.
Here Pavithra is using a different meaning of "logical". Formal logic
controls what can be deduced from a set of axioms and facts. Whether the
axioms are "logical" or not is not considered, so long as they are
> Are you trying to represent an illogical behavior using logic?
At some level, most human behaviour is illogical. It is emotional
or unthinking. One would hope that an ontology for human actions
would be able to use logic to record such behaviour and reason about
-- doug f.
Disclaimer: I am not a cannibal.
doug foxvog doug@xxxxxxxxxx http://ProgressiveAustin.org
"I speak as an American to the leaders of my own nation. The great
initiative in this war is ours. The initiative to stop it must be ours."
- Dr. Martin Luther King
Message Archives: http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/ontolog-forum/
Config Subscr: http://ontolog.cim3.net/mailman/listinfo/ontolog-forum/
Shared Files: http://ontolog.cim3.net/file/
Community Wiki: http://ontolog.cim3.net/wiki/
To join: http://ontolog.cim3.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?WikiHomePage#nid1J
To Post: mailto:ontolog-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx