Re: [ontolog-forum] language vs logic - ambiguity andstartingwithdefinit

[FERENC KOVACS <f.kovacs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Alex,

I am looking forward to see your ontology.

It is not a freebie, I am afraid. All my efforts on this forum has been to generate a dialogue betwen those interested and me in order to come to an agreement that such an ontology is needed, and it is doable. As soon as I find enough people to justify the establishment of a foundation for the utilisation and exploitation of a deliverable in that line to be mutually defined and accepted, i am ready to go vested interest in creating such an ontology as I am not in this busines and environment at all.

 

But keep in mind that following Aristotle you may need more categories - he counts 10, they say (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Categories_%28Aristotle%29).

I do not think that I need Aristotle's categories. my philosophyical backgound comes from Hegel, a lot more updotae view of the world in terms of categories.

May be it's better just to write an article? IMHO - commenting is not a good way to introduce paradigm.

 

You are right. I have written a  couple of papers to introduce parts of the paradigm on the net. But since there has been not much response to motivate me, including your current reponse here, I am of the opinion that sooner or later some of you will try to figure out what I am about and keep silent about it until coming out with his own version. I am aware of the business value of such a hypothetical solution (new paradigm) put in practice.

Ferenc

_________________________________________________________________
Message Archives: http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/ontolog-forum/  
Config Subscr: http://ontolog.cim3.net/mailman/listinfo/ontolog-forum/  
Unsubscribe: mailto:ontolog-forum-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Shared Files: http://ontolog.cim3.net/file/
Community Wiki: http://ontolog.cim3.net/wiki/ 
To join: http://ontolog.cim3.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?WikiHomePage#nid1J
To Post: mailto:ontolog-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx    (01)