| To: | "[ontolog-forum]" <ontolog-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| From: | Alex Shkotin <alex.shkotin@xxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Sat, 18 Sep 2010 13:51:02 +0400 |
| Message-id: | <AANLkTikBBuCtmcWiNr=ZMMKxKvgcn+OPXO_zvMGHRVq2@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|
Ferenc, why do you think that in commonsense knowledge domain definitions of m-w need any comment? I mean - what is a goal of your comments? make m-w definitions more clear? but I think these are clear enough? or what? In math logic domain there is a kind of definition - an abbreviation when they introduce new symbol saying for example: definition t≤s denotes t<s or t=s Alex
2010/9/18 FERENC KOVACS <f.kovacs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
_________________________________________________________________ Message Archives: http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/ontolog-forum/ Config Subscr: http://ontolog.cim3.net/mailman/listinfo/ontolog-forum/ Unsubscribe: mailto:ontolog-forum-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Shared Files: http://ontolog.cim3.net/file/ Community Wiki: http://ontolog.cim3.net/wiki/ To join: http://ontolog.cim3.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?WikiHomePage#nid1J To Post: mailto:ontolog-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (01) |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [ontolog-forum] language vs logic - ambiguity and starting withdefinitions, FERENC KOVACS |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [ontolog-forum] language vs logic - ambiguity and startingwithdefinitions, FERENC KOVACS |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [ontolog-forum] language vs logic - ambiguity and starting withdefinitions, FERENC KOVACS |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [ontolog-forum] language vs logic - ambiguity and startingwithdefinitions, FERENC KOVACS |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |