|To:||Rob Freeman <lists@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "[ontolog-forum]" <ontolog-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>|
|From:||ravi sharma <drravisharma@xxxxxxxxx>|
|Date:||Tue, 26 Jan 2010 21:47:33 -0500|
Appreciate your response.
I am a bit clearer now, and obviously a lot still remains to be done. Thanks for bringing some clarity to: model, uncertainty and undecidability.
Is the computational irreducibility similar to irreducible representation in group theory? Or is it so that the problem is not amenable to computation (at least with current information)?
Penrose talks about computability of mind (processes), is it irreducible if so in capacity of today's machines or because we can not yet reduce it to computation?
On Tue, Jan 26, 2010 at 5:49 PM, Rob Freeman <lists@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
(Dr. Ravi Sharma)
313 204 1740 Mobile
_________________________________________________________________ Message Archives: http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/ontolog-forum/ Config Subscr: http://ontolog.cim3.net/mailman/listinfo/ontolog-forum/ Unsubscribe: mailto:ontolog-forum-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Shared Files: http://ontolog.cim3.net/file/ Community Wiki: http://ontolog.cim3.net/wiki/ To join: http://ontolog.cim3.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?WikiHomePage#nid1J To Post: mailto:ontolog-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (01)
|<Prev in Thread]||Current Thread||[Next in Thread>|
|Previous by Date:||Re: [ontolog-forum] Can Syntax be Semantic?, Rob Freeman|
|Next by Date:||[ontolog-forum] Note for the day, John F. Sowa|
|Previous by Thread:||Re: [ontolog-forum] Can Syntax be Semantic?, Rob Freeman|
|Next by Thread:||Re: [ontolog-forum] Can Syntax be Semantic?, Rob Freeman|
|Indexes:||[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]|