Paola: (01)
Here is the reference and the work: (02)
Title: Interoperability Model for Cognitive Communications and Intelligence,
2009, Nickull, Duane A et al http://www.web2open.org/work/IMCCI.pdf (03)
Comments invited. (04)
Duane (05)
On 6/13/09 4:04 AM, "paola.dimaio@xxxxxxxxx" <paola.dimaio@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: (06)
> Hay Duane
>
> doesnt matter what we call it, as long as it can be uniquely identified,
> right? possibly with meaningful and short and dereferenceable uid)
>
> ( I have been evangelized :-) )
>
> But it brings up another ontological question. What are we looking at?
>
> if this layered model pertains to one or more of the following domains:
>
> linguistic
> cognitive/knowledge
> logic
> simulation/operations
> systems/it
>
> or what
>
> then, what kind of model are we looking at? where do we place it?
>
> is this an ontological layer we are looking at?
>
>
> how do we define this kind of model in emergent interdisciplinary research?
>
> or what?
>
>
>
> p
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> On Sat, Jun 13, 2009 at 7:07 AM, Duane Nickull <dnickull@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> The interoperability Semantic Underluying Cognitive knowledge model?
>>
>> D
>>
>>
>>
>> On 6/12/09 4:47 PM, "Duane Nickull" <dnickull@xxxxxxxxx
>> <http://dnickull@xxxxxxxxx> > wrote:
>>
>>> I hadn¹t really thought of a formal name for the model when I composed it.
>>> Someone referred to is as ³Duane¹s Drawing² once but that is not going to
>>> work. I am open to ideas.
>>>
>>> Duane
>>>
>>>
>>> On 6/12/09 11:52 AM, "paola.dimaio@xxxxxxxxx <http://paola.dimaio@xxxxxxxxx>
>>> " <paola.dimaio@xxxxxxxxx <http://paola.dimaio@xxxxxxxxx> > wrote:
>>>
>>>> Andreas Duane and all
>>>>
>>>> Recently I have started to move away from the (was it Morris/Pierce view?)
>>>> syntactic, semantic, pragmatic three layer model, in favour of a more
>>>> granular set of layers, where there is a clear separation for example
>>>> between.
>>>>
>>>> 'semantic' and 'conceptual', as well as possibly identifying additional
>>>> layers such as procedural, operational, etc
>>>>
>>>> (had forgotten all about Andreas model which I quoted in another paper but
>>>> not the most recent ones, its amazing to see how some areas of the brain
>>>> become more active, other areas become more dormant, where is that brain
>>>> informatics cfp again?)
>>>>
>>>> Duane, do you have a citation for your diagram? I may need to start
>>>> maintaining an index
>>>>
>>>> I attach two diagrams, integrated knowledge framework is Carlisle, the
>>>> more granular is mine
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> PDM
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Tue, Jun 9, 2009 at 3:51 PM, Duane Nickull <dnickull@xxxxxxxxx
>>>> <http://dnickull@xxxxxxxxx> > wrote:
>>>>> Andreas:
>>>>>
>>>>> I was working on a similar model to years ago. It is attached. I am glad
>>>>> to see I was not out to lunch completely. While I never gave a lot of
>>>>> thought to my work, in order for interoperability to happen, some form of
>>>>> understanding must be incorporated into a model. The old OSI stack
>>>>> completely (and perhaps wisely) ignored this aspect of interoperability.
>>>>>
>>>>> One day when I have put enough time in writing code and architecting, I
>>>>> hope to get an engineering fellowship type job and be able to work on
>>>>> stuff like this full time.
>>>>>
>>>>> Duane
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On 6/9/09 7:08 AM, "Tolk, Andreas" <atolk@xxxxxxx <http://atolk@xxxxxxx>
>>>>> <http://atolk@xxxxxxx> > wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Hi all,
>>>>>> Together with John Miller I am editing a special issue of the journal of
>>>>>> simulation focusing on the use of ontological means in support of
>>>>>> interoperability. I hope that some of you know the Levels of Conceptual
>>>>>> Interoperability Model
>>>>>> (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Conceptual_interoperability
>>>>>> <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Conceptual_interoperability> ) which we
>>>>>> successful used to make people aware that you have to capture your
>>>>>> entities, relations, processes, and constraints (including axioms) in
>>>>>> machine-understandable form, which means logic, which means ontological
>>>>>> means.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Some possible topics discussed in this forum already are
>>>>>> * Can we embed our models into a common conceptual model of the operation
>>>>>> space (upper ontology)?
>>>>>> * Can we capture model ambassadors as intelligent agents arguing about
>>>>>> composability using ontological means?
>>>>>> * Is the ontological spectrum sufficient for this kind of application?
>>>>>> * Should we capture requirements as ontology artifacts to enable machine
>>>>>> understandability?
>>>>>> * And many more
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The official call for papers is accessible via the website
>>>>>> http://www.palgrave-journals.com/jos/index.html
>>>>>> <http://www.palgrave-journals.com/jos/index.html>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I would like to see some of our discussions featured in archived form.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Also, I am always looking for volunteers helping me as peer reviewers
>>>>>> (hint, hint).
>>>>>>
>>>>>> All the best
>>>>>> Andreas
>>>>>> ==================== ;-)
>>>>>> Andreas Tolk, Ph.D.
>>>>>> Associate Professor Engineering Management & Systems Engineering
>>>>>> Old Dominion University, Norfolk, VA 23529
>>>>>> Voice 757-683-4500 Fax 757-683-5640
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> (07)
--
Sr. Technical Evangelist Adobe Systems
Chair OASIS SOA RM Technical Committee
Manager Adobe LiveCycle ES Developers List (08)
Blog: http://technoracle.blogspot.com
Twitter: duanechaos
Duane¹s World TV: http://www.duanesworldtv.org
Band: http://www.myspace.com/22ndcentury
Author <a
href=²http://technoracle.blogspot.com/2009/05/web-20-architecture-book-is-he
re.html ³>Web 2.0 Architecture</a> (09)
_________________________________________________________________
Message Archives: http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/ontolog-forum/
Config Subscr: http://ontolog.cim3.net/mailman/listinfo/ontolog-forum/
Unsubscribe: mailto:ontolog-forum-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Shared Files: http://ontolog.cim3.net/file/
Community Wiki: http://ontolog.cim3.net/wiki/
To join: http://ontolog.cim3.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?WikiHomePage#nid1J
To Post: mailto:ontolog-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (010)
|