|To:||"Sebastian Rudolph" <rudolph@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>|
|Cc:||"[ontolog-forum] " <ontolog-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, KR-language <KR-language@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, public-owl-comments@xxxxxx|
|From:||"Richard H. McCullough" <rhm@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>|
|Date:||Wed, 13 May 2009 12:59:46 -0700|
No, I am not satisfied with your proposed additional text.
If OWL2 "class" is the "extension set" of a "concept",
your document should say that.
If your document does not say that, you are missing
this unique opportunity to eliminate the confusion
associated with RDF "class".
I propose adding the text below as the first paragraph
of section 4 of the OWL2 primer.
Natural languages use a "concept" to refer to a group
of similar, individual entities. A "concept" may be
defined by its
"extension" -- the set of all individual entities
which are members of the group
"genus" -- the more general group which includes
all individual members of the group
"differentiae" -- the properties [a.k.a. "intension"]
which are shared by all individual
members of the group, and which
distinguish them from other members
of the "genus".
In OWL 2:
a "class" is the "extension set" of a "concept";
the "class" is a "subClassOf" the "genus class";
property "restrictions" specify the "differentiae".
----- Original Message -----
From: "Sebastian Rudolph" <rudolph@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Wednesday, May 13, 2009 10:41 AM
Subject: [LC response] To Richard H. McCullough
> Dear Richard,
> Thank you for your comment
> on the OWL 2 Web Ontology Language last call drafts.
> In order to avoid any possible confusion we have added some text to
> the OWL 2 Primer that clarifies the meaning of class and the
> correspondence with concept (see <http://www.w3.org/2007/OWL/wiki/index.php?title=Primer&diff=23518&oldid=23517
> As a historical remark, the use of "class" in OWL 2 comes from its
> prior use in related representation systems. RDF uses "class" (as
> opposed to "concept" or another term). The original version of OWL
> uses "class" to be compatible with RDF.
> Please acknowledge receipt of this email to <mailto:public-owl-comments@xxxxxx
> > (replying to this email should suffice). In your acknowledgment
> please let us know whether or not you are satisfied with the working
> group's response to your comment.
> Sebastian Rudolph
> on behalf of the W3C OWL Working Group
> Dr. Sebastian Rudolph
> Institute AIFB, University of Karlsruhe, D-76128 Karlsruhe
> rudolph@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx phone +49 (0)721 608 7362
> www.sebastian-rudolph.de fax +49 (0)721 608 5998
_________________________________________________________________ Message Archives: http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/ontolog-forum/ Config Subscr: http://ontolog.cim3.net/mailman/listinfo/ontolog-forum/ Unsubscribe: mailto:ontolog-forum-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Shared Files: http://ontolog.cim3.net/file/ Community Wiki: http://ontolog.cim3.net/wiki/ To join: http://ontolog.cim3.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?WikiHomePage#nid1J To Post: mailto:ontolog-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (01)
|<Prev in Thread]||Current Thread||[Next in Thread>|
|Previous by Date:||Re: [ontolog-forum] Ontology Project Organization:, Azamat|
|Next by Date:||Re: [ontolog-forum] Ontology Project Organization:, Dave McComb|
|Previous by Thread:||[ontolog-forum] 2nd CFP RuleML-2009 - 3rd International Symposium on Rules, Applications and Interoperability, Adrian Paschke|
|Next by Thread:||[ontolog-forum] 2009 Protege Conference: Early Registration Deadline, Jennifer Vendetti|
|Indexes:||[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]|