John, (01)
An interesting side note on terminology is the patented CCTS naming
convention. The designation (or Dictionary Entry Name) for a concept of
"someone who drives a taxi" would be (if I remember correctly) something
along the lines: (02)
"TaxiDriver_ Driver_ Doer_ Agent_ Initiator_ Source_ Participant_ Part_
Component_ PrehendedEntity_ Actuality_ Physical_ T" (03)
I.e. when one defines a child component one has to add a qualifier to
the designation, such as "Tiger_ Animal", where "Tiger_ Animal" is
'based on' "Animal". (04)
The hierarchy of CCTS concepts does not follow traditional sub-typing
principles, multiple parents are not allowed, properties must be
promoted to the top/root concepts so they can be later restricted in
children (contxtualised), ultra-high, high and mid level concepts are
not used since CCTS rule create a very high barrier for such ontological
practice (if at all feasible). (05)
I leave the rest to interested readers of the CCTS specification. (06)
/Anders (07)
_________________________________________________________________
Message Archives: http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/ontolog-forum/
Config Subscr: http://ontolog.cim3.net/mailman/listinfo/ontolog-forum/
Unsubscribe: mailto:ontolog-forum-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Shared Files: http://ontolog.cim3.net/file/
Community Wiki: http://ontolog.cim3.net/wiki/
To join: http://ontolog.cim3.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?WikiHomePage#nid1J
To Post: mailto:ontolog-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (08)
|