Hi Duane, (01)
Maybe so but "Semantic Web" as a label was coined by him and his vision is
his vision. It may be open for interpretation and criticism but
redefinition of it, I believe, is not a real option, as he owns the label as
a concept. (02)
My Best, (03)
Frank (04)
On 8/13/08 12:21 PM, "Duane Nickull" <dnickull@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: (05)
> I find this statement widely open to interpretation and suboptimal. It's
> almost as bad as some definitions of artificial intelligence. What does it
> really mean for a machine to read or understand a page? Machines have been
> able to read pages forever (this is the basis of the first iteration ob the
> web). The metrics of "more effectively crawling etc" are surely subjective,
> as is the notion of intelligence. Calling it Web 3.0 is a dumd idea IMO.
>
> Feh!!!!
>
> Duane
> Aus mein Blackberry/from my Blackberry
> (06)
_________________________________________________________________
Message Archives: http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/ontolog-forum/
Subscribe/Config: http://ontolog.cim3.net/mailman/listinfo/ontolog-forum/
Unsubscribe: mailto:ontolog-forum-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Shared Files: http://ontolog.cim3.net/file/
Community Wiki: http://ontolog.cim3.net/wiki/
To Post: mailto:ontolog-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (07)
|