[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [ontolog-forum] Semantic Web shortcomings [was Re: ANN: GoodRelation

To: "[ontolog-forum]" <ontolog-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
From: Frank Guerino <Frank.Guerino@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 13 Aug 2008 13:42:46 -0400
Message-id: <C4C89556.17ECC%Frank.Guerino@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

Hi Duane,    (01)

Maybe so but "Semantic Web" as a label was coined by him and his vision is
his vision.  It may be open for interpretation and criticism but
redefinition of it, I believe, is not a real option, as he owns the label as
a concept.    (02)

My Best,    (03)

Frank    (04)

On 8/13/08 12:21 PM, "Duane Nickull" <dnickull@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:    (05)

> I find this statement widely open to interpretation and suboptimal.  It's
> almost as bad as some definitions of artificial intelligence. What does it
> really mean for a machine to read or understand a page?  Machines have been
> able to read pages forever (this is the basis of the first iteration ob the
> web).  The metrics of "more effectively crawling etc" are surely subjective,
> as is the notion of intelligence. Calling it Web 3.0 is a dumd idea IMO.
> Feh!!!!
> Duane
> Aus mein Blackberry/from my Blackberry
>     (06)

Message Archives: http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/ontolog-forum/  
Subscribe/Config: http://ontolog.cim3.net/mailman/listinfo/ontolog-forum/  
Unsubscribe: mailto:ontolog-forum-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Shared Files: http://ontolog.cim3.net/file/
Community Wiki: http://ontolog.cim3.net/wiki/ 
To Post: mailto:ontolog-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx    (07)

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>