Hi Ed, (01)
Thank you for the nice description. I have to confess that I am an absolute
novice in the "rules arena", and at the moment scratching the surface to gather
more information. Is there a study and/or a general opinion about which of
these 3 activities is more widely adopted, practical (in terms of applications)
etc.? The reason I am asking this is because I would like to invest my energy
first in learning more about the popular one. (02)
Thanks,
- Jyoti (03)
-----Original Message-----
From: ontolog-forum-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:ontolog-forum-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Ed Barkmeyer
Sent: Wednesday, October 17, 2007 10:33 AM
To: [ontolog-forum]
Subject: Re: [ontolog-forum] Presentation on Rules for Semantic Web (04)
Jyoti wrote: (05)
> I am a new member to this forum, and was wondering if in the past
> there has been a presentation on rules for the semantic Web? If yes,
> could someone please provide me the relevant URLs? And if not, do we
> plan to have such a presentation in the future? (06)
"rules for the Semantic Web" is not a well-defined concept. There are three
major activities, which may or may not be currently closely coupled, depending
on whom you ask:
- the W3C Rule Interchange Format Working Group, which is ostensibly about a
standard XML form for interchange of "rules" among "conventional rules engines"
(aka "directed reasoning" systems), like Jess and Jena and the ILOG engine, but
is populated by enough Semantic Spiders that the relationship to RDF and SPARQL
is a major "requirement".
- the SWRL work, which is about a computationally bounded "rules language"
for things like static validation, that is solidly grounded in first-order
reasoning. (This is primarily a community of former OWL
developers.)
- the RuleML work, which began as an XML version of Prolog, but now includes
5 languages with largely common syntax and largely distinct
semantics: Logic Programming (a la Prolog), Condition/Action (directed
reasoning a la Rete), Event/Condition/Action, Validation, and Transformation.
(This is primarily a community of people who think OWL is a waste of time, but
agree on little else.) (07)
There were (brief) presentations on all of these at the 2006 WorldWideWeb
conference, and they show up pretty regularly at other "semantic web"
conferences and sessions. And there are probably at least three others I don't
know anything about. I don't believe the Ontolog Forum has yet hosted a
presentation on any of them. And IMO, we would first have to decide how many
different "rule" concepts we want to talk about and which ones. (08)
-Ed (09)
--
Edward J. Barkmeyer Email: edbark@xxxxxxxx
National Institute of Standards & Technology Manufacturing Systems Integration
Division
100 Bureau Drive, Stop 8263 Tel: +1 301-975-3528
Gaithersburg, MD 20899-8263 FAX: +1 301-975-4694 (010)
"The opinions expressed above do not reflect consensus of NIST,
and have not been reviewed by any Government authority." (011)
_________________________________________________________________
Message Archives: http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/ontolog-forum/
Subscribe/Config: http://ontolog.cim3.net/mailman/listinfo/ontolog-forum/
Unsubscribe: mailto:ontolog-forum-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Shared Files: http://ontolog.cim3.net/file/ Community Wiki:
http://ontolog.cim3.net/wiki/ To Post: mailto:ontolog-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (012)
_________________________________________________________________
Message Archives: http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/ontolog-forum/
Subscribe/Config: http://ontolog.cim3.net/mailman/listinfo/ontolog-forum/
Unsubscribe: mailto:ontolog-forum-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Shared Files: http://ontolog.cim3.net/file/
Community Wiki: http://ontolog.cim3.net/wiki/
To Post: mailto:ontolog-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (013)
|