Good thinking ... (02)
We actually have an ongoing initiative called "Ontologizing the
Ontolog Body of Knowledge" (ref:
which there is active work going on under the OntologTaxoThesaurus
project that BobSmith and DeniseBedford are heading. You might want to
check that out. (03)
As far as the collaborative Protege tool is concerned, you might want
to take that up at the [protege-user] forum. (04)
... yes, it would be nice if we have a "community entry" to the
challenge, wouldn't it!? (05)
On 4/18/07, Eric Lindahl <eric.lindahl@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> It would be even more useful if we could 'eat our own dogfood' WRT CC et al.
> The collaborative Protege tool didn't have a download.
> Will there be a sandbox for us Ontolog'ers?
> I've done some minor editing on OntoWiki, but it wouldn't be cricket to
> upload large transaction sets.
> -Eric (07)
> On 4/17/07, Peter Yim <peter.yim@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > Fyi ... I hope some of us will be participating. =ppy
> > P.S. Thank you Natasha, Peter, York, et al. ... a very meaningful
> > challenege, indeed! =ppy
> Message Archives:
> Unsubscribe: mailto:ontolog-forum-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Shared Files: http://ontolog.cim3.net/file/
> Community Wiki: http://ontolog.cim3.net/wiki/
> To Post: mailto:ontolog-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Message Archives: http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/ontolog-forum/
Shared Files: http://ontolog.cim3.net/file/
Community Wiki: http://ontolog.cim3.net/wiki/
To Post: mailto:ontolog-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (09)