[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [ontolog-forum] [Fwd: Re: {Disarmed} Re: OWL and lack of identifiers

To: Waclaw Kusnierczyk <Waclaw.Marcin.Kusnierczyk@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Ontolog Forum <ontolog-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
From: Pat Hayes <phayes@xxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 16 Apr 2007 14:29:08 -0500
Message-id: <p06230906c2497ed0256f@[]>
>>And this is, after all, an example from a primer. The best way to 
>>express this in RDF would be to use a typed literal with the 
>>xsd:date system, which is required to exactly denote a date; but 
>>the primer had not covered datatyping at this point.
>It did, of course.  (The 2004 version does speak of xml-schema datatypes.)    (01)

Sorry, I meant, at this point in the text. I know the primer covers datatypes.    (02)

IHMC            (850)434 8903 or (650)494 3973   home
40 South Alcaniz St.    (850)202 4416   office
Pensacola                       (850)202 4440   fax
FL 32502                        (850)291 0667    cell
phayesAT-SIGNihmc.us       http://www.ihmc.us/users/phayes    (03)

Message Archives: http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/ontolog-forum/  
Subscribe/Config: http://ontolog.cim3.net/mailman/listinfo/ontolog-forum/  
Unsubscribe: mailto:ontolog-forum-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Shared Files: http://ontolog.cim3.net/file/
Community Wiki: http://ontolog.cim3.net/wiki/ 
To Post: mailto:ontolog-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx    (04)

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>