Yup! I second. ... let's do that (as Evan suggests). =ppy
-- (01)
ewallace@xxxxxxxxxxxx wrote Thu, 2 Jun 2005 17:12:02 -0400 (EDT):
> Peter wrote:
>
>>You saw the input from Steve too, right? (see:
>>http://ontolog.cim3.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?ConferenceCall_2005_06_02#nidCVN
>>)
>>Would (some of) the time he propose work well for you?
>>
>>In particular, has the SWBPD decide on their regular telecon time
>>yet (if not, when do you think you'll know for sure)? We
>>definitely don't want to run into that again!
>
>
> A new SWBPD time has not yet been determined and won't be for another
> two weeks at a minimum :(. For this reason, I request that the Ontolog
> Forum defer consideration of moving its regular time until 30 June at
> the earliest.
>
> -Evan
_________________________________________________________________
Message Archives: http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/ontolog-forum/
Subscribe/Unsubscribe/Config:
http://ontolog.cim3.net/mailman/listinfo/ontolog-forum/
Shared Files: http://ontolog.cim3.net/file/
Community Wiki: http://ontolog.cim3.net/wiki/
To Post: mailto:ontolog-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (02)
|