I forward an exchange from the OASIS ebXML-Business Process TC regarding
Object Constraint Language. (01)
Quite coincidentally, the subject of UML2/OCL mapping came up in our
NIST-Ontolog meeting last Friday (2004.07.09) as that has been
identified as being one of the language/formats which we would want our
normative CCTONT be mapped to (ref:
http://ontolog.cim3.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl/wiki.pl?CctRepresentation#nid0136). (02)
Those who are interested/concerned with the matter may want to take a
look at the attachment in Monica Martin / Fred van Blommestein's message. (03)
-ppy (04)
--- Begin Message ---
>van Blommestein: Find attached the proposal for collecting OCL subset
>requirements. Afterwards, other priorities took over in UN/CEFACT, so there
>was never any follow-up.
>One of the requirements, as far as I am concerned, is the ability to convert
>the OCL for pre- and postconditions from and into XPath statements without
>loosing semantics, referring either to the collection of exchanged documents
>or to the knowledge base built up by those documents.
>
>Would you please distribute the document and the remarks above to the list as
>I do not have rights to do that? Thanks.
>
>Fred
>
mm1: As a followup to our teleconference call today where we referenced
OCL. From Fred vanBlommestein. (01)
OCL.doc
Description: MS-Word document
--- End Message ---
_________________________________________________________________
Message Archives: http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/ontolog-forum/
Subscribe/Unsubscribe/Config:
http://ontolog.cim3.net/mailman/listinfo/ontolog-forum/
Shared Files: http://ontolog.cim3.net/file/
Community Wiki: http://ontolog.cim3.net/wiki/
To Post: mailto:ontolog-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (01)
|