I've posted a few thoughts that came to mind at:
I would rather characterize the exercise as "putting the UBL-Ontology
project back on track" rather than a "re-launch", though. (02)
Kurt Conrad wrote Mon, 12 Apr 2004 10:40:20 -0700: (04)
> At last week's meeting, the participants decided to relaunch the UBL
> Ontology Project. Toward that end -- and to provide a well-documented
> close out of existing UBL Ontology Project activities -- we also decided
> to conduct a lessons learned project review.
> The lessons learned discussion is scheduled for this Thursday's
> conference call (see
> http://ontolog.cim3.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?ConferenceCall_2004_04_15 for
> the particulars when they become available).
> All who participated (however limited) in the existing UBL Ontology
> Project are encouraged to join us for the conference call and/or
> contribute their ideas on the lessons learned Wiki page:
> I especially encourage those of you who had limited involvement with the
> project to provide input, as one of our key goals for this exercise is
> to re-launch the UBL project in such a way as to improve participation.
> Your input is critical to help us understand what can be done to get
> better participation, in the future.
> /s/ kwc 2004.04.12 10:40
> Kurt Conrad (05)
Message Archives: http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/ontolog-forum/
Shared Files: http://ontolog.cim3.net/file/
Community Wiki: http://ontolog.cim3.net/wiki/
To Post: mailto:ontolog-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (06)