|To:||"[ontolog-forum] " <ontolog-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>|
|From:||Douglas McDavid <mcdavid@xxxxxxxxxx>|
|Date:||Sat, 28 Feb 2004 17:55:07 -0800|
One way that identifier and code have been differentiated in my experience is:
>> Cassidy: For Tim --
>> I found the UML and XLS that you provided very helpful in
>> the core components. There are still ambiguities, but there is enough
>> information that I am working on formalizing them into an ontology
>> consistent with SUMO/MILO -- though it requires a number of additions
>> to the SUMO beyond the bare core component types themselves.
>> One thing that appears missing from the UML (and the xls) is
>> any notion of subclasses or subtypes. There are a few core
>> components that appear to me to be subtypes of others --
>> a CodeList Scheme, for example, would seem to be a subtype of
>> Identifier Scheme, and Code is a subclass of Identifier.
> mm1: No, Pat they are not. There have been long debates about
> differences between code and identifier. Regardless if the differences
> are well-understood or not, they are different. Don't ask me to
> explain it because I am not the expert.
mm2: I am trying to get a copy of the white paper draft that Mike Adcock
did explaining the differences. I thought I had retained it but am
unable to locate. Mike is now deceased. I will send when I acquire. Thanks.
Message Archives: http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/ontolog-forum/
Shared Files: http://ontolog.cim3.net/file/
Community Wiki: http://ontolog.cim3.net/wiki/
To Post: mailto:ontolog-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
|<Prev in Thread]||Current Thread||[Next in Thread>|
|Previous by Date:||Re: [ontolog-forum] Core Component Representation, Patrick Cassidy|
|Next by Date:|
|Previous by Thread:|
|Next by Thread:|
|Indexes:||[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]|