ontolog-forum
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [ontolog-forum] [Fwd: [ubl-lcsc] Models for generating CCT and Data

To: "[ontolog-forum] " <ontolog-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
From: Douglas McDavid <mcdavid@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 28 Feb 2004 17:55:07 -0800
Message-id: <OFB7088ED2.1F51F86D-ON88256E49.000655B2-88256E49.000A865F@xxxxxxxxxx>

One way that identifier and code have been differentiated in my experience is:

Identifier is a data surrogate for something that is of interest to the enterprise. Examples would be a Social Security number or employee identification number.

Code is one of a set of valid values that conveys a characteristic of something otherwise identified. So a market segment code might be applied to a customer who is identified by a SSN or customer identifier.

This is just one way that these concepts can be used. Polysemy is always with us!


Doug McDavid

Almaden Services Research
IBM Academy of Technology - http://www-306.ibm.com/ibm/academy/index.html
mcdavid@xxxxxxxxxx
408-927-1565 (IBM tie-line: 457)e
ASR - http://www.almaden.ibm.com/asr/
http://www.almaden.ibm.com/coevolution/
BASIS - http://www.research.ibm.com/basis/
ODIS - http://www.research.ibm.com/odis


Inactive hide details for "Monica J. Martin" <Monica.Martin@xxxxxxx>"Monica J. Martin" <Monica.Martin@xxxxxxx>




          "Monica J. Martin" <Monica.Martin@xxxxxxx>
          Sent by: ontolog-forum-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

          02/28/2004 06:55 AM
          Please respond to "[ontolog-forum] "



To: "[ontolog-forum]" <ontolog-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
cc:
Subject: Re: [ontolog-forum] [Fwd: [ubl-lcsc] Models for generating CCT and Data Type schemas]



>> Cassidy: For Tim --
>>    I found the UML and XLS that you provided very helpful in
>> understanding
>> the core components.  There are still ambiguities, but there is enough
>> information that I am working on formalizing them into an ontology
>> consistent with SUMO/MILO -- though it requires a number of additions
>> to the SUMO beyond the bare core component types themselves.
>>
>>    One thing that appears missing from the UML (and the xls) is
>> any notion of subclasses or subtypes.  There are a few core
>> components that appear to me to be subtypes of others --
>> a CodeList Scheme, for example, would seem to be a subtype of
>> Identifier Scheme, and Code is a subclass of Identifier.
>
> mm1: No, Pat they are not. There have been long debates about
> differences between code and identifier. Regardless if the differences
> are well-understood or not, they are different. Don't ask me to
> explain it because I am not the expert.

mm2: I am trying to get a copy of the white paper draft that Mike Adcock
did explaining the differences. I thought I had retained it but am
unable to locate. Mike is now deceased.  I will send when I acquire. Thanks.

_________________________________________________________________
Message Archives:
http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/ontolog-forum/
Subscribe/Unsubscribe/Config:
http://ontolog.cim3.net/mailman/listinfo/ontolog-forum/
Shared Files:
http://ontolog.cim3.net/file/
Community Wiki:
http://ontolog.cim3.net/wiki/ 
To Post:
mailto:ontolog-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

GIF image

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>