Hi Mike, (01)
Looks mighty interesting! (02)
re. OWL - (I assume you mean OWL DL) I'm not entirely sure of the pros/cons
overall, but I'd be tempted to define the schema/ontology using owl:Class
rather than rdfs:Class and so on to start with, it should be easier to loosen
later than tighten. It should be fun in the reasoners too ;-) (03)
There's some related material (you've probably seen before, but just in case!)
around the recent ESW RDF Thesaurus work: (04)
http://www.w3c.rl.ac.uk/SWAD/thesaurus.html
http://esw.w3.org/topic/RdfThesaurus (05)
Cheers,
Danny. (06)
> -----Original Message-----
> From: ontolog-forum-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> [mailto:ontolog-forum-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]On Behalf Of Michael
> Daconta
> Sent: 22 January 2004 22:58
> To: [ontolog-forum]
> Subject: [ontolog-forum] Wordnet Representations - XSD/RDF/OWL
>
>
> Hi Everyone,
>
> Note: for those also subscribed to rdf-interest, I apologize for the
> cross-post.
>
> As part of a taxonomy framework, we will be linking taxonomies lexically
> by requiring each term to be mapped to a WordNet synonym or synset.
>
> As a start, I created an XSD schema and instance that follows the
> striped syntax and is thus also parseable as RDF.
>
> Here is a partial sample instance:
>
> <wn:Word xmlns:rdf='http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#'
> xmlns:wn='http://www.daconta.net/wn#' rdf:ID='dog'
> xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"
> xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.daconta.net/wn# Word.xsd" >
> <wn:partsOfSpeech rdf:parseType='Collection'>
> <wn:PartOfSpeech wn:type='verb'>
> <wn:concepts rdf:parseType='Collection'>
> <wn:Concept rdf:ID='_1943890'>
> <wn:definition>go after with the intent to
> catch; "The policeman chased the mugger down the alley";
> "the dog chased the rabbit"</wn:definition>
> <wn:relations rdf:parseType='Collection'>
> <wn:Relation wn:type='hypernym'
> wn:tgt='_1942900'/> ...
> <wn:Relation wn:type='hyponym'
> wn:tgt='_1946245'/>
> </wn:relations>
> <wn:synonyms rdf:parseType='Collection'>
> <wn:Synonym wn:lemma='chase_after'/>
> <wn:Synonym wn:lemma='give_chase'/>
> </wn:synonyms>
> </wn:Concept>
> </wn:concepts>
> </wn:PartOfSpeech> …
>
> If you are interested in playing around with this, there is a schema,
> test program and simple web service at
> http://www.daconta.net/project_folder/WordnetMetamodel.html .
>
> I have two questions for this group …
>
> 1. Would it be better to leave this as RDF or create an OWL ontology for
> the Wordnet metamodel.
>
> 2. How would you handle wordnet addressing? In other words, a link from
> a Topic to a Wordnet Concept (aka synset) or
> Synonym. Another aspect of this would be how closely wordnet relations,
> map to XTM associations and OWL relations.
>
> Thanks for any feedback,
>
> - Mike
> -----------------------------
> Michael C. Daconta
> Chief Scientist, APG McDonald Bradley, Inc.
> www.daconta.net
>
> _________________________________________________________________
> Message Archives: http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/ontolog-forum/
> Subscribe/Unsubscribe/Config:
http://ontolog.cim3.net/mailman/listinfo/ontolog-forum/
Shared Files: http://ontolog.cim3.net/file/
Community Wiki: http://ontolog.cim3.net/wiki/
To Post: mailto:ontolog-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (07)
_________________________________________________________________
Message Archives: http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/ontolog-forum/
Subscribe/Unsubscribe/Config:
http://ontolog.cim3.net/mailman/listinfo/ontolog-forum/
Shared Files: http://ontolog.cim3.net/file/
Community Wiki: http://ontolog.cim3.net/wiki/
To Post: mailto:ontolog-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (08)
|