Thanks, Adam. Meeting minutes updated. See: (01)
http://ontolog.cim3.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?Conference_Call_2003-07-31#nid062 (02)
-ppy
-- (03)
Adam Pease wrote Thu, 31 Jul 2003 12:04:33 -0700:
> Peter,
> One correction, at least as I understand what the consensus was
>
> # further discussion/debate pertaining to whether LineItemID? needs to
> be captured in the ontology was made (062)
>
> * Adam sees this as being an implementation issue (063)
> * the group agreed to capture it in the ontology anyway (will someone
> please summarize the arguments on the discussion fforum, please)
>
> I believe the consensus was that implementation issues such as ID
> numbers, would be captured in separate documents that relate the
> structure of a legacy model to the ontology and vice versa.
>
> Adam (04)
_________________________________________________________________
Message Archives: http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/ontolog-forum/
Subscribe/Unsubscribe/Config:
http://ontolog.cim3.net/mailman/listinfo/ontolog-forum/
Shared Files: http://ontolog.cim3.net/file/
Community Wiki: http://ontolog.cim3.net/wiki/
To Post: mailto:ontolog-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (05)
|