| To: | ontolog-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
|---|---|
| From: | MDaconta@xxxxxxx |
| Date: | Sun, 13 Jul 2003 22:16:43 EDT |
| Message-id: | <1a0.17cb54ea.2c436c8b@xxxxxxx> |
In a message dated 7/13/2003 3:48:12 PM US Mountain Standard Time, adampease@xxxxxxxxxxxxx writes:I really appreciate all the work you are doing. I still have concerns I can see how people can debate these issues for years. That is why we must have a "forcing function". I see the use cases in that role. They may not be sufficient though. I recommend part of the call on Thursday address ways to judge one representation over another. Talk to you soon, - Mike --------------------------------------------------- Michael C. Daconta Chief Scientist, APG, McDonald Bradley, Inc. www.daconta.net |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [ontolog-forum] Next Conference Call - Ontology Work Session - Is 2003-0..., MDaconta |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [ontolog-forum] Next Conference Call - Ontology Work Session - Is 2003-07-24 OK?, Peter P. Yim |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [ontolog-forum] UBL Invoice ontology V0.1, Adam Pease |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [ontolog-forum] Next Conference Call - Ontology Work Session - Is 2003-0..., MDaconta |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |