To: | ontolog-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
---|---|
From: | MDaconta@xxxxxxx |
Date: | Sat, 12 Jul 2003 17:00:42 EDT |
Message-id: | <38.3b2cc5f2.2c41d0fa@xxxxxxx> |
Hi All, Ok, here is an initial whack at an Invoice ontology. See http://www.daconta.net/UBLOntology.html. That page lists the classes I added. Following the discussion here I did make Invoice an Abstract concept that can have a Grounding to a physical representation. I also allow Invoice to have a Context (though the class is little more than a placeholder now) that could constrain/modify the behavior of axioms for our abstract Invoice based on a specific perspective. Once we debate/refine this ... we then need to add the other key classes needed to implement one or more of our use cases. Then the real fun begins ... inference, rules, etc. ... Let's push onward, - Mike --------------------------------------------------- Michael C. Daconta Chief Scientist, APG, McDonald Bradley, Inc. www.daconta.net |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: [ontolog-forum] Use of SUMO and "patient" of a Process, Patrick Cassidy |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [ontolog-forum] Use of SUMO and "patient" of a Process, MDaconta |
Previous by Thread: | [ontolog-forum] Use of SUMO and "patient" of a Process, MDaconta |
Next by Thread: | Re: [ontolog-forum] UBL Invoice ontology V0.1, Patrick Cassidy |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |