[Top] [All Lists]

[ontolog-forum] Re: [ontolog] Providing Review to the UBL Jan-2003 Relea

To: ontolog-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
From: "Peter P. Yim" <yimpp@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 04 Apr 2003 10:55:44 -0800
Message-id: <3E8DD530.4000004@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Thank you, Adam.    (01)

I have slapped together a wiki page for the purpose. It's at 
http://ontolog.cim3.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?UblRelease0p70    (02)

Attention Everyone: Please contribute to it. This will be important 
and a effective means to influence how UBL would move forward after 
this release. The UBL TC does take all feedback seriously, and will be 
reviewing and disposing of them, comment-by-comment, individually.    (03)

Please post your comments (either to the wiki or to the forum) ASAP, 
hopefully no later than Wed 09-Apr-03. That way, we can talk about it 
a little at the 10-Apr-03 conference call, if we need to, and allow 
someone a bit of time to reformat it into the official UBL feedback 
format to make a proper submission.    (04)

Thanks in advance,
PPY    (05)

P.S. Adam, ref the above, appreciate if you could elaborate on your 
post a bit more (include links and references, ... etc.). Please 
assume that some of the audience do not have exposure to ontologies or 
ontological engineering. If we can get your (and everyone's) comment 
in a way that is good enough to consolidate into a combined submission 
later, that would be wonderful.
--    (06)

-------- Original Message --------
Subject: Re: [ontolog-forum] Minutes of the 2003.04.03 Conference Call
Date: Fri, 04 Apr 2003 09:25:04 -0800
From: Adam Pease <apease@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Reply-To: "[ontolog-forum] " <ontolog-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: "[ontolog-forum] " <ontolog-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, 
"[ontolog-forum]" <ontolog-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <>    (07)

    My high level comment for the UBL group would be similar to what 
I'm advocating for this group - reuse an existing upper level model to 
avoid duplication, increase standardization and future reuse 
potential.  We could use the correspondence list I put together to 
illustrate our early work on the concrete impact of an existing upper 
level model.    (08)

---    (09)

At 09:21 AM 4/4/2003 -0800, Peter P. Yim wrote:
 > ...[snip]...
 > 2. If possible, I think as a group, we should still try to provide
 > some review/comment to UBL on their 0p70 release. Since quite a few
 > of us has gone into the material by now, could we round up a few
 > and try to put something together, albeit, fairly high level
 > comments? We need to act very quickly, though.
 > Kindly step forward and identify yourselves, if you can work on
 > either 1 or 2 above. Thanks in advance.
 >PPY    (010)

Message Archives: http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/ontolog-forum/
Shared Files: http://ontolog.cim3.net/file/
Community Wiki: http://ontolog.cim3.net/wiki/  To Post: 
mailto:ontolog-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx    (011)

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
  • [ontolog-forum] Re: [ontolog] Providing Review to the UBL Jan-2003 Release, Peter P. Yim <=