Sounds great, Mike. Thank you for looking into it and sharing your
insight. (01)
By the way, I've updated the "Metholodology" wiki page (see
http://ontolog.cim3.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?Methodology ). (02)
Everyone: please continue to post your thoughts. (03)
-ppy
-- (04)
MDaconta@xxxxxxx wrote Tue, 25 Mar 2003 11:20:34 EST:
> In a message dated 3/6/2003 3:49:20 PM US Mountain Standard Time,
> lobrst@xxxxxxxxx writes:
>
>> By the way, both of these papers are on Chris Welty's home page:
>> http://www.cs.vassar.edu/faculty/welty/.
>
>
>
> Hi Everyone,
>
> In looking at these papers, I don't see these methodologies as
> being in competition. I see it as an issue of granularity. The
> welty and guaranino papers discuss finer points of ontology
> construction (identity, rigidity, dependence) which can easily
> be included in Step 4.1 which is "ensuring that the class
> hierarchy is correct". In other words, the process is a multi-pass
> process.
>
> Thus, I would recommend that the overaching framework be the
> Ontology 101 process with a "Welty and Guarino" pass in step 4.
>
> Thoughts?
>
> - Mike
> -------------------------------
> Michael C. Daconta
> Chief Scientist, Advanced Programs Group
> McDonald Bradley, Inc.
> www.daconta.net (05)
_________________________________________________________________
Message Archives: http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/ontolog-forum/
Shared Files: http://ontolog.cim3.net/file/
Community Wiki: http://ontolog.cim3.net/wiki/ To Post:
mailto:ontolog-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (06)
|