Hi Joel, (01)
If this is in relation to the hackathon (especially the low-level
details) then use [ontolog-dev]. (02)
However, it really depends on (a) how generic-vs-specific your
question is, (b) who, you hope, will answer your question, and (c)
whether the Q&A outcome is of value to a narrower or broader audience.
Your options are (among more others),
- ask privately off-list
- [ontolog-dev] (about 50 subscribers)
- [ontology-summit] (about 500 subscribers)
-- [ontolog-forum] (about 1000 subscribers)
... that said, it's your call! (03)
And, yes, if it is of value to the community as I whole, I do hope it
gets captured (archived, and indexed for search, etc. etc.) on the
mailing list (or other workspaces in the ONTOLOG collaborative work
environment.) (04)
As for where/how workspaces will be designated for the
hackathon-clinics projects, I guess we will probably get to cover that
in the meeting next week (and definitely at the Thu 3/28 s11 virtual
session.) Part of the answer should and will come from the
hackathon-clinics participants, so bring your suggestion up then. (05)
Regards. =ppy
-- (06)
On Mar 14, 2013 7:59 AM, "Joel Bender" <jjb5@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Peter,
>
>
> I have some specific questions for my ontology, should I use the
>[ontolog-dev] list for them? They might be considered "noobie" questions and
>I don't want to bother people with them. I was going to set up a Google Group
>for this effort, but you might want the discussion on this list rather than
>some other.
>
>
> Joel
>
>
_________________________________________________________________
To Post: mailto:ontolog-admin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Message Archives: http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/ontolog-admin/
Community Wiki: http://ontolog.cim3.net/wiki/
Shared Files: http://ontolog.cim3.net/file/
Community Portal: http://ontolog.cim3.net/ (07)
|