Pat, (01)
Rather than pulling it, please consider moving that to your namesake
page. That way, we get the best of both worlds. I think the community
is getting a lot of value from trying out your tool. (Unfortunately,
we need to keep this collaborative work environment commercial-free
... otherwise we can become a free advertising space in no time!) (02)
Thanks & regards. =ppy
-- (03)
On 2/20/07, Pat Hayes <phayes@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> >Pat,
> >
> >Is your COE (Cmap Ontology Editor) under an open source license?
>
> No. It is free but not OS. I wish it were, but
> some of the code is protected by patents that are
> owned by UWF, and we are no longer part of UWF.
>
> Having read the Wiki conditions, it may be that
> we need to pull the entry, as we cannot release
> it on the 'free' licence which requires access to
> the source. :-(
>
> Pat
>
> >
> >Thanks. =ppy
> >-- (04)
> >Peter P. Yim wrote Mon, 19 Feb 2007 23:33:04 -0800:
> >>Thank you, Duane.
> >>
> >>One caveat ...
> >>
> >>Before making a post to the wiki, please do
> >>check to make sure the user licensing
> >>arrangement of your tools are indeed consistent
> >>with the Ontolog IPR Policy
> >>(http://ontolog.cim3.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?WikiHomePage#nid32
> >>).
> >>I would suggest that poster also mention which
> >>Free (Libre) or Open Source License is
> >>applicable when they post.
> >>
> >>A review of my recent post on a similar issue
> >>(ref:
> >>http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/ontolog-forum/2007-02/msg00234.html#nid02
> >>) may be helpful.
> >>
> >>While it is ok (even when your software is not
> >>open sourced) to respond to a solicitation for
> >>information on the mailing list (forum) with a
> >>brief message for the requesting party to go to
> >>your website or follow-up with you offline,
> >>please make sure your software licensing
> >>arrangement is consistent with our IPR policy
> >>before cataloging it on our wiki.
> >>
> >>If there is any question, please feel free to
> >>e-mail me (offline) for clarification.
> >>
> >>Thanks & regards. =ppy
> >>--
> >
> >
> >>Duane Nickull wrote Fri, 16 Feb 2007 08:50:49 -0800:
> >>>This question has been asked before. We actually have a tools section on
> >>>the wiki:
> >>>
> >>>http://ontolog.cim3.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?WikiHomePage#nid2A
> >>>
> >>>I would like to ask for all those who responded with advice to please
> >>>consider updating or adding information to this area where appropriate.
> >>>This knowledge should be captured.
> >>>
> >>>Duane
> >
> >
> >>>On 2/16/07 6:00 AM, "Rex Brooks" <rexb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>>Hi Chandu,
> >>>>
> >>>>When you use the word "any" you are asking for a
> >>>>lot and I expect that the relative lack of
> >>>>response may be attributed to that. However, if
> >>>>you ask for "most" ontologies, then there are
> >>>>several candidates, among which I would say
> >>>>Protégé is probably one of the best.
> >>>>
> >>>>Regards,
> >>>>Rex
> >
> >
> >>>>At 4:23 PM +0530 2/16/07, chandu wrote:
> >>>>>Is there any generic ontology browser which can
> >>>>>load any ontology and allow us to browse
> >>>>>through? any project going on? Or is it that
> >>>>>browser depends on the ontology itself and cant
> >>>>>be independent of ontology?
> >>>>>
> >>>>>--
> >>>>>"Dream as if you'll live forever;
> >>>>>Live as if you'll die today."
>
>
> --
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> IHMC (850)434 8903 or (650)494 3973 home
> 40 South Alcaniz St. (850)202 4416 office
> Pensacola (850)202 4440 fax
> FL 32502 (850)291 0667 cell
> phayesAT-SIGNihmc.us http://www.ihmc.us/users/phayes
>
>
_________________________________________________________________
To Post: mailto:ontolog-admin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Message Archives: http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/ontolog-admin/
Community Wiki: http://ontolog.cim3.net/wiki/
Shared Files: http://ontolog.cim3.net/file/
Community Portal: http://ontolog.cim3.net/ (05)
|