ontolog-admin
[Top] [All Lists]

[ontolog-admin] Re: Follow-up on speaker invitations

To: Duane Nickull <dnickull@xxxxxxxxx>
Cc: cshankey@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Cc: ontolog-admin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Cc: dbedford@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Cc: maxim@xxxxxxxxxx
Cc: rexb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Cc: park@xxxxxxxxxx
Cc: Roy.Roebuck@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
From: "Peter P. Yim" <peter.yim@xxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 09 Mar 2006 10:26:46 -0800
Message-id: <44107366.1020105@xxxxxxxx>
No problem, Duane.    (01)

Have a good UN/CEFACT meeting next week and relay our best wishes 
from Ontolog.    (02)

... Repeat the word "ontology" a few times for our sake! :-)    (03)

Cheers.  =ppy
--    (04)


Duane Nickull wrote Thu, 9 Mar 2006 10:07:46 -0800:
> Apologies for not being more active - the UC/CEFACT conference next week is
> taking all my time and then some.
> 
> Duane
> 
> 
> *******************************
> Adobe Systems, Inc. - http://www.adobe.com
> Vice Chair - UN/CEFACT  http://www.uncefact.org/
> Chair - OASIS SOA Reference Model Technical Committee
> Personal Blog - http://technoracle.blogspot.com/
> *******************************     (05)


> -----Original Message-----
> From: dbedford@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:dbedford@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] 
> Sent: Thursday, March 09, 2006 5:55 AM
> To: Peter P. Yim
> Cc: Bob Smith; Kurt Conrad; Conor Shankey; Duane Nickull; Michael
> Maximilien; [ontolog-admin]; Jack Park; Rex Brooks; Roy Roebuck
> Subject: Re: Follow-up on speaker invitations
> 
> Peter and tea,
> 
> I have been called into a high level meeting starting at 10 today.   I will
> catch up with all of you as soon as it ends.  I am not sure how long the
> meeting
> will last.
> 
> My apologies - we have had a lot of this over the past six months.
> 
> Best regards,
> Denise
> 
> 
>  
> 
>              "Peter P. Yim"
> 
>              <peter.yim@cim3
> 
>              .com>
> To 
>                                      Denise Bedford
> <dbedford@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>,   
>              03/08/2006              Conor Shankey
> 
>              07:24 PM                <cshankey@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Jack
> Park  
>                                      <park@xxxxxxxxxx>, Roy Roebuck
> 
>                                      <Roy.Roebuck@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Michael
> 
>                                      Maximilien <maxim@xxxxxxxxxx>, Kurt
> Conrad 
>                                      <conrad@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Duane
> Nickull 
>                                      <dnickull@xxxxxxxxx>, Rex Brooks
> 
>                                      <rexb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Bob Smith
> 
>                                      <Bob@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> 
>  
> cc 
>                                      "[ontolog-admin]"
> 
>                                      <ontolog-admin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> 
>  
> Subject 
>                                      Re: Follow-up on speaker invitations
> 
>  
> 
>  
> 
>  
> 
>  
> 
>  
> 
>  
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> All,
> 
> I've extended BobSmith's worksheet (which he created on
> 2006.01.25 for our 2006.01.26 discussion) to cover a slightly
> broader planning horizon. It's now available at:
> 
> http://ontolog.cim3.net/file/work/Ontolog-planning/Ontolog_Event_Plan_2006_2
> 0060309.doc
> 
> 
> Please review it prior to tomorrow's call. We'll attempt to use
> that as a planner/sign-up sheet to lock-in the invitations and
> event schedule for (at least) the next quarter.
> 
> Thanks & regards.  =ppy
> --
> 
> 
> Peter P. Yim wrote Mon, 06 Mar 2006 22:38:57 -0800:
>> Hello Denise, Conor, Jack, Roy & Max (inviting MikeGenesereth and UIMA
>> speakers), (along with Duane, Kurt, Rex and Bob,)
>>
>> I am writing to follow-up on the discussion we had during our Feb. 16,
>> 2006 Ontolog conference call, during which we discussed the invitation
>> of you guys to come present at Ontolog (which Kurt and I were supposed
>> to follow-up offline with you all on.)
>>
>> [I apologize for not having done the follow-up sooner, as I had to make
>> an emergency trip out-of-the-country, and after my return, had been
>> consumed with the preparation work for the Upper Ontology Summit.]
>>
>> For those of you who are new to the scene, let me reiterate Ontolog's
>> 'open' (open technology, open content, open standard, open knowledge,
>> ...) policy. We nominally only feature speakers who have made valuable
>> contribution to our field, and who are doing 'open' and 'original' work
>> that are relevant to the Ontolog charter. The only sessions that we have
>> agreed that we will feature proprietary technologies would be at the
>> "Ontology Application and Implementation" Session(s) that DuaneNickull
>> and KurtConrad has spearheaded. Additionally, we also make an attempt
>> not to duplicate efforts with BrandNiemann and Susan Turnbull's
>> Collaborative Expedition Workshop or SICoP Event speakers (at least, not
>> on the same talks) given that we share our invitation lists and have a
>> considerable overlap between our respective communities (call this the
>> 'non-duplicative' policy).
>>
>> I believe Jack (on IRIS, or possibly together with AdamCheyer to speak
>> on IRIS and CALO), MikeGenesereth (topic of his choice) and UIMA will
>> satisfy both the 'open' and the 'non-duplicative' policies. I also
>> realize that if Denise were to tell us about her WorldBank work with
>> Teragram (which is a proprietary technology), that would need to be part
>> of an "Application/Implementation" session (where the 'open' policy may
>> be temporarily waived).
>>
>> I have a feeling Conor and Roy are both working with 'proprietary'
>> technologies too, but I'm not sure. Could you both confirm this for me,
>> please. [attn: Conor & Roy]
>>
>> With our two upcoming "Ontolog Content Tagging" sessions, possibly one
>> "Application/Implementation" session, and one "health" or "emergency
>> response" session and say, 3 invited speaker sessions, we'll probably
>> put together a very exciting programming for the next 3 months.
>>
>> Let's hear back from everyone (prior to this Thursday's call as to which
>> upcoming Thursdays (which you already know) won't work for you within
>> the next 3 months or so (starting from 3/23 through end June 2006.) That
>> way, we'll have a better handle when we do our planning at our Thu 3/9
>> call. Your help here is much appreciated. [attn: ALL on the to: or c.c.
>> list.]
>>
>> Thank you very much for the support.
>>
>> Best regards.  =ppy
>> --
>>
>>
>>
>>
> 
> 
> 
_________________________________________________________________
To Post: mailto:ontolog-admin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Message Archives: http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/ontolog-admin/
Community Wiki: http://ontolog.cim3.net/wiki/
Shared Files: http://ontolog.cim3.net/file/  
Community Portal: http://ontolog.cim3.net/    (06)
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>