Duane, (01)
I'll let you and Kurt make the call (to suit yourselves ... as
you two have to be available in the first place.) (02)
So far, only 12/8 has been taken up (Jim Spohrer of IBM on
Service Sciences - ref:
http://ontolog.cim3.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?MeetingsCalls#nidEXT),
therefore 12/1, 12/15, 12/22 & 12/29 are all open. (03)
I am going to be on vacation (out of the country) and will not be
available for the 12/22/05, 12/29/05 & 1/5/06 calls, although I
can still get the freeconference call and recording line set up
(before I leave town) if you end up picking one of those 3 dates. (04)
Cheers. =ppy
-- (05)
Duane Nickull wrote Wed, 2 Nov 2005 10:58:26 -0800:
> Peter:
>
> Good thoughts. Can you please fix a date then I can reword the call
> appropriately for the one session.
>
> Thanks
>
> Duane (06)
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Peter P. Yim [mailto:peter.yim@xxxxxxxx]
> Sent: Wednesday, November 02, 2005 11:22 AM
> To: Duane Nickull
> Cc: Kurt Conrad; [ontolog-admin]
> Subject: Re: Shamesless-plugs, Dec-2005 Discussion session prep, etc.
> [was-Re: suggested wording - draft]
>
> Duane,
>
> That looks real good.
>
> One concern I have, though, is that without fixing a date, people
> can't even tell (themselves) if they could be available. Besides,
> I can create a session page easier, if I have a date first.
> Alternatively, we can create a "Ontology Application and Use
> Case" and/or a "Ontology Application Implementation" page(s) and
> work from that.
>
> The way you are cutting this submission deadline (11/30), it will
> make the planning and advertising of a December session difficult.
>
> Therefore, if we are still planning this for Dec-2005, we should
> just (arbitrarily) pick a date, and start from there. People can
> then submit, saying they are submitting this for the Dec-2005
> panel, or, alternatively, they can submit by saying they are
> interested to present, but they are not available for Dec. and
> could be considered for later discussions.
>
> I actually would suggest that we ONLY call for one session (the
> Dec-2005 session) now, and go for "more sessions" through popular
> demand, rather than committing ourselves to a "series" at the
> word go. [This is only a suggestion ... I am not adamant about it
> at all, I see pros and cons both ways.]
>
> ... just some random thoughts.
>
> Cheers. =ppy
> --
>
>
> Duane Nickull wrote Wed, 2 Nov 2005 10:58:26 -0800:
>
>>Peter/Kurt:
>>
>>Let's make the final call draft, agree on it then post it.
>>
>>The latest I have is:
>>
>>*** CALL FOR SUBMISSIONS ***
>>
>>Title: Implementation Experience Discussion
>>
>>Synopsis:
>>
>>The Ontolog Forum wishes to conduct one or more technical discussions
>>based on real-world implementation experience with ontologies and
>>semantic-integration topics.
>>
>>The Discussion Sessions:
>>
>>We are striving for highly-interactive sessions. Each session will
>
> run
>
>>approximately 1.5 hours. Panelists will present their 2-3 slides
>>showcasing some implementation of Ontology and semantic concepts. Each
>>presentation will be followed by an open Q&A (approximately 10
>
> minutes).
>
>>The remaining time will be used for general discussion. The sessions
>>will be moderated by Duane Nickull and Kurt Conrad.
>>
>>The organizers are soliciting individuals with experience in this area
>>to submit 2-3 slides to serve as a starting point for the discussion
>
> and
>
>>a brief (1-2 paragraph) summary/abstract to help with selection and
>>scheduling. Submissions may be sent to the email addresses below and
>>the deadline is Nov 3o, 2005
>>
>>It is expected that the level of interest and response will be
>
> influence
>
>>the number discussions that will be held, as we are targeting 3-4
>>panelists per discussion.
>>
>>Vendors are also invited to respond, but preference will be given to
>>submissions discussing end-user experiences and how their problems
>>were/are being solved. Please avoid generic marketing presentations -
>
> be
>
>>as specific as possible
>>
>>For those wishing to submit a presentation, please send an email to
>
> both
>
>>Kurt Conrad <Conrad-AT-sagebrushgroup-DOT-com> and Duane Nickull
>><dnickull-AT-adobe-DOT-com> with the requested slides and summary.
>
> After
>
>>the submissions have been reviewed, dates will be finalized for the
>>presentations. We will be scheduling the discussion for one or more
>
> of
>
>>the standard Ontolog virtual meetings: Thursdays at 10:30am Pacific.
>>
>>**********************************************************************
>>
>>Does this work? If so, let's place it on the WIKI and also post to
>
> the
>
>>list. I also have a list of people I want to post this to.
>>
>>Duane
>>
>
>
_________________________________________________________________
To Post: mailto:ontolog-admin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Message Archives: http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/ontolog-admin/
Community Wiki: http://ontolog.cim3.net/wiki/
Shared Files: http://ontolog.cim3.net/file/
Community Portal: http://ontolog.cim3.net/ (07)
|