Great! thank you, Michael. (01)
This is Bill McCarthy's session, therefore, please direct any
pre-session content related question to him, if there is any. (02)
As for slides, please email them to Bill <mccarthy@xxxxxxxxxxx>
with a copy to me <peter.yim@xxxxxxxx> by end-of-day 6/29. (03)
If anyone has additional references to share, feel free to (a)
post them to the session wiki page directly (under)
<http://ontolog.cim3.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?ConferenceCall_2005_06_30#nidDM2>
Alternatively, you can also choose to (b) post them to the
[ontolog-forum] <ontolog-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> or (c) email
them to Bill with a copy to me and specifying that they are to be
shared. [ALL: this is applicable to both pre- and post-session.] (04)
Bill and I have got the deck of George's 15 slides
<IPTF_for_Ontologists.ppt> from Steve already, but I believe I
still need a confirmation that that is the set to be posted (with
the understanding that only a couple of them will be used during
the session.) [George - please confirm.] (05)
This is exciting .. I'm really looking forward to next Thursday's
session now. (06)
Thanks & regards. =ppy
-- (07)
Michael Gruninger wrote Fri, 24 Jun 2005 09:21:16 -0400:
> Hi Peter,
> I am definitely planning to attend.
> I am expecting to have two or three slides to summarize my remarks.
>
> - michael (08)
> Peter Yim wrote:
>
>> I have started the 2005.06.30 Discussion Session page on the wiki
>> along with details we have so far. Please take a look at:
>>
>> http://ontolog.cim3.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?ConferenceCall_2005_06_30
>>
>> To help us reserve adequate resources (like #lines on the conference
>> bridge) for the session, please RSVP offline to me if you are planning
>> to attend. Feel free to invite your friends, if you think they can
>> contribute to or benefit from the discussion.
>>
>> This is going to be a very interesting and relevant session.
>> Don't miss it!
>>
>> Best regards. =ppy
>> -- (09)
>> Peter Yim wrote Thu, 23 Jun 2005 19:00:15 -0700:
>>
>>> *ANNOUNCEMENT*
>>>
>>> Please note below, an abstract on our next Ontolog Technical
>>> Discussion session:
>>>
>>> Title: *Interoperability Concerns in the Growth of Service Sciences:
>>> Ontological Implications of SOA*
>>>
>>> Moderator: Professor William E. McCarthy - Michigan State Univ.
>>>
>>> Date: Thursday June 30, 2005
>>> Time: 10:30am~12:30pm PDT / 1:30~3:30pm PDT
>>>
>>> Format: Panel & Open Discussion over an augmented conference call
>>>
>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>
>>> From: McCarthy, William
>>> Sent: Thursday, June 23, 2005 1:25 PM
>>> To: '[ontolog-forum] '
>>> Subject: panel on Ontological implications of SOA
>>>
>>>
>>> Hi Peter et al.
>>>
>>>
>>> Here is my proposed summary of next week’s panel on interoperability
>>> concerns in the growth of service sciences.
>>>
>>> Topic: Interoperability Concerns in the Growth of Service
>>> Sciences -- Ontological Implications of SOA
>>>
>>>
>>> Traditionally, trading partners -- both within and between firms –
>>> trafficked in bundled tangible products like consumer goods or
>>> partially assembled finished goods. Many early e-commerce standards
>>> assumed implicitly product-based exchanges.
>>>
>>> Increasingly however, the growth in exchange and bundling of
>>> *Services* in the US and in other economies has supplanted tangible
>>> goods as the raison d’etre of international and domestic commerce.
>>> Estimates of the percentage of the gross domestic product of the US
>>> due to services (as opposed to goods) range as high as 80%. This
>>> trend has led to increased interest in services and the establishment
>>> of new research centers like the proposed "Center for Services
>>> Sciences" at U.C. Berkeley. A good of overview of such trends is
>>> the brief article by Henry Chesbrough:
>>>
>>>
>http://news.ft.com/cms/s/9b743b2a-0e0b-11d9-97d3-00000e2511c8,dwp_uuid=6f0b3526-07e3-11d9-9673-00000e2511c8.html
>
>>>
>>>
>>> In e-commerce, this growth in service provision has been mirrored by
>>> the advent of Service-Oriented Architectures which support
>>> integration and creation of composite solutions (bundles of services)
>>> from loosely-coupled components assembled both within an enterprise
>>> (outputs from legacy applications) and outside of the enterprise
>>> (typically XML-based Web services).
>>>
>>> Whether or not the integrated services originate from incompatible
>>> operations inside the firm or from incompatible vendor interfaces
>>> from outside the firms, semantic inconsistencies, redundancies, and
>>> discrepancies make the vision of integrated services an ontological
>>> problem. The purpose of this panel is to explore the ontological
>>> implications of service Sciences in general and of Service-Oriented
>>> Architectures in particular. We will start our Ontolog session with
>>> some general comments from notable practitioners in the SOA and
>>> ontology areas. We will then open up the discussion to more general
>>> comments and critiques.
>>>
>>> ------------------------------------------
>>>
>>> Please mark your calendars now. I'll have the wiki session page up
>>> shortly with more details. =ppy
_________________________________________________________________
To Post: mailto:ontolog-admin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Message Archives: http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/ontolog-admin/
Community Wiki: http://ontolog.cim3.net/wiki/
Shared Files: http://ontolog.cim3.net/file/
Community Portal: http://ontolog.cim3.net/ (010)
|