Wonderful! Thanks Nenad. Great to have you on the team. (01)
> As we discussed, a wide range of participation, particularly from
> the standards community that implemented the core component types
> would be very critical. (02)
I totally agree. I am hoping we could engage more people in the
ontology community too ... but I had better do a bit more homework
first before putting that proposal out in front of the entire community. (03)
Best regards,
PPY
-- (04)
Nenad Ivezic wrote Fri, 12 Mar 2004 08:23:50 -0500: (05)
> Hi Peter:
>
> I am copying on this message potentially interested parties at NIST and
> OAG to consider participating in this new effort. I suggest this title
>
> An Ontological Basis for ebXML Core Component Types
>
> As we discussed, a wide range of participation, particularly from the
> standards community that implemented the core component types would be
> very critical.
>
> Thanks,
>
> - Nenad (06)
> -----Original Message-----
> From: ontolog-forum-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> [mailto:ontolog-forum-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Peter Yim
> Sent: Thursday, March 11, 2004 9:46 PM
> To: ontolog-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: Re: [ontolog-forum] Re: Modeling/formalizing representation of
> Core Component Types
>
> Thanks to Pat Cassidy, Kurt Conrad, Nenad Ivezic, Tim McGrath, Bo
> Newman, Adam Pease & Peter Yim who participated (and to Mark Crawford,
> Monica Martin & Sue Probert who sent in their regrets - believe
> they're all in Bonn now at the UN/CEFACT face-to-face meeting), we had
> a most productive conference call, that lasted a little over 2 hours.
>
> The proceedings is captured on at meeting wiki page at:
> http://ontolog.cim3.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?ConferenceCall_2004_03_11_CCT
>
> We all agreed that there is good potential for using ontological
> engineering methodologies to make a contribution here. Those at the
> call decided to start a task force and a mini project to look further
> into the matter. We will try to engage representatives from multiple
> standards body that are involved, and will aim at producing a report
> (over the next 3 months) on findings and recommendations on the
> modeling/formalizing representation of the ebXML Core Component Types.
>
> All: please continue the discourse on this thread. I'll be setting up
> a project page on the wiki for this (shortly) too.
>
> Thanks & regards. -ppy
> -- (07)
> _________________________________________________________________
> Message Archives: http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/ontolog-forum/
> Subscribe/Unsubscribe/Config:
>http://ontolog.cim3.net/mailman/listinfo/ontolog-forum/
> Shared Files: http://ontolog.cim3.net/file/
> Community Wiki: http://ontolog.cim3.net/wiki/
> To Post: mailto:ontolog-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
>
> (08)
_________________________________________________________________
To Post: mailto:ontolog-admin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Message Archives: http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/ontolog-admin/
Community Wiki: http://ontolog.cim3.net/wiki/
Shared Files: http://ontolog.cim3.net/file/
Community Portal: http://ontolog.cim3.net/ (09)
|