Adam, (01)
>
> 3. Crowd-sourcing (differences articulated)
> Open discussion up to all of IAOA membership
> OR
> Restrict discussion to members of the lexicon working group (02)
The dichotomy of "restricted" vs. "open" might be interpreted in a misleading
way. As far as I am concerned (and I would be very surprised if Antony sees
this differently), any interested IAOA member is welcome to join the education
committee and its subcommittees. Thus, no IAOA member is restricted from
participating in the lexicon project. (03)
Thus, the only choice is whether the discussion within the subcommittee should
take place on the general IAOA member list or on some other list. One reason
for having specialized committees and associated mailing list is that not
everybody in the IAOA is interested in everything that is going on. Thus, it
seems obvious to me that we don't want to have a terminology discussion on the
IAOA member list, but on a mailing list whose audience is restricted to people
who are likely interested in the subject. So either the discussion should
happen on a designated mailing list for the subcommittee or it should happen on
the education committee list. (04)
I recommend to continue to use the education committee list, because you will
get the benefit of contributions from people who are interested but do not
have the time to commit to regular contributions. Frank's email is a good case
in point. By the way, all EC council members are on the education mailing list;
thus, this is also a way to keep the EC in the loop. (05)
Best
Fabian (06)
_____________________________________________________________________
Msg Archives: http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/iaoa-education/
Committee File-share: http://iaoa.cim3.net/file/work/Committee/Education/
Committee Wiki: http://ontolog.cim3.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?IaoaEducation
Activities Blog: http://iaoa-activities.blogspot.com/ ...(coming!)
To join: please email committee chair or to: info @ iaoa.org
IAOA website: http://iaoa.org (07)
|