health-ont
[Top] [All Lists]

[health-ont] Re: Follow-up: Health Informatics Panel Discussion Session

To: <marc.wine@xxxxxxx>, <david.whitten@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, <sriram@xxxxxxxx>, "[health-ont]" <health-ont@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "Rex Brooks" <rexb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, <Bob@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "Mark Musen" <musen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: michellearaymond@xxxxxxxxx
Cc: brett.trusko@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
From: "Brand Niemann" <bniemann@xxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 2 Sep 2005 11:24:19 -0400
Message-id: <015f01c5afd2$639cf1b0$1401a8c0@family575i3htt>
See http://www.omg.org/hc-omg. I just got the announcement of this
Healthcare Interoperability Workshop, October 24-27th, in Alexandria, VA.
Maybe we should participate and partner with them!    (01)

Brand    (02)

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Rex Brooks" <rexb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <Bob@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx@smi.stanford.edu>; <marc.wine@xxxxxxx>;
<whitten@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; <sriram@xxxxxxxx>; <bniemann@xxxxxxx>;
<health-ont@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: <brett.trusko@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; <michellearaymond@xxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Friday, September 02, 2005 10:35 AM
Subject: Follow-up: Health Informatics Panel Discussion Session 2?    (03)


> Dear Panelists, Health-Ont Listmembers, Brett, Michelle:
>
> During yesterday's Ontolog Forum meeting, we discussed having a
> second session of our panel discussion, and I wanted to ask our
> panelists all if you think this is a good idea, since we could
> dispense with the introductory presentations and dig right into the
> topics we did not have time for last week and those questions which
> were added during the discussion?
>
> During the meeting we discussed scheduling such a renewed panel
> discussion in early November, the 3rd to be precise, but as I spoke
> with Peter Yim this morning, we thought we would ask if the week
> after next would be better, while it is still fresh in our minds?
> That would September 15, 2005.
>
> That was what I had originally intended, although I did not bring
> that up in the meeting yesterday. I think that a November date ought
> to require an effort similar to what we mounted for last week's
> session, but if we can gather a significant number of our panelists
> for week after next, such an effort would not be needed, because it
> is so fresh in our minds. Also, we have our questions already
> formulated, so we don't need a round of introductory remarks setting
> up the relationship of each panelist to the topic.
>
> The main point is that I think we can make significant headway on the
> questions, and perhaps discover new interconnections between our
> respective fields of expertise and ways and means for advancing large
> scale ontology projects in this particularly receptive and extremely
> important field.
>
> I also want to let you all know that I will be working on
> transcribing the panel discussion this weekend so that we can move
> the summary report along to completion in a timely way.
>
> Regards,
> Rex Brooks
>
> -- 
> Rex Brooks
> President, CEO
> Starbourne Communications Design
> GeoAddress: 1361-A Addison
> Berkeley, CA 94702
> Tel: 510-849-2309    (04)

 _________________________________________________________________
Msg Archives: http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/health-ont/
Community Files: http://ontolog.cim3.net/file/work/health-ont/NHIN-RFI/
To  Post: mailto:health-ont@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Community Wiki: http://ontolog.cim3.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?NhinRfi    (05)
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>