cctont-imp
[Top] [All Lists]

[cctont-imp] Re: [Fwd: Re: [ontolog-forum] CCTONT work progress: Proteg

To: ewallace@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Cc: cctont-imp@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Cc: Holger Knublauch <holger@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
From: "Peter P. Yim" <peter.yim@xxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 23 Nov 2004 18:25:27 -0800
Message-id: <41A3F117.7030805@xxxxxxxx>
 >> 3. Would you be able to join us at the call this Wednesday? (ref: 
http://ontolog.cim3.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?ConferenceCall_2004_11_24)    (01)

 >  [Evan] I could join you, if you think it might be helpful.    (02)

[ppy]  please. Of course, your participation will be of help. We need 
all the brain power we can tap into, to make our case to the eBusiness 
standards community as compelling as we can possibly make it!    (03)

Hope to "see" you at the call tomorrow.    (04)

-ppy
--    (05)

ewallace@xxxxxxxxxxxx wrote Tue, 23 Nov 2004 15:23:39 -0500 (EST):    (06)

>Peter Yim wrote:
>  
>
>>Holger & Evan,
>>
>>1. Can you do something with Pat's latest Protege version of the [cctont]?
>>
>>2. In particular,
>>
>>(a) what would it take to go from here to something in OWL?
>>
>>(b) can we use the protege version to help us get to some of the less 
>>expressive representations (e.g. UML diagrams, XML/schemas, ...)
>>    
>>
>
>I loaded the ontology into Protege and had a look at it.  Nice work Pat.
>
>I'm not that familiar with Core Protege.  Is there any way to show only select
>modules?  As it is, its a bit like having a flat file system with the
>system files (in this case - SYSTEM-CLASS, CONSTRAINT, <=>, etc) and user 
>files 
>all in the same space.  Also, it would also be nice to view just the CCTONT 
>elements without seeing all the SUMO constructs (while still being able to 
>navigate 
>to the underlying SUMO constructs when needed).  By the way, are all those 
>SUMO 
>modules really needed here or were some (e.g. QoS) just thrown in for the heck 
>of 
>it?
>
>The Protege people will certainly be better equipt to explain what conversions
>are enabled by the Protege Core rendering of CCTONT.  If I were to convert 
>things 
>like this, I would be more inclined to operate on native KIF or CL forms then 
>on 
>Protege KBs.  However, much like Holger, developing such conversions are not 
>in my 
>current program of work.
>
>  
>
>>3. Would you be able to join us at the call this Wednesday? (ref: 
>>http://ontolog.cim3.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?ConferenceCall_2004_11_24)
>>    
>>
>
>I could join you, if you think it might be helpful.
>
>-Evan
>
>  
>    (07)

 _________________________________________________________________
To  Post: mailto:cctont-imp@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Msg Archives: http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/cctont-imp/
Community Wiki: http://ontolog.cim3.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?CctRepresentation
Community Files: http://ontolog.cim3.net/file/work/CCT-Representation/
Community Portal: http://ontolog.cim3.net/    (08)
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>