> Holger & Evan,
>
> 1. Can you do something with Pat's latest Protege version of
> the [cctont]?
>
> 2. In particular,
>
> (a) what would it take to go from here to something in OWL? (01)
I don't have enough background to fully understand this ontology,
but with its heavy use of system (meta) classes, there is no way
to use the generic Protege to OWL converters to extract an OWL
file. Either the file needs to be manually pre-processed with
Protege core mode, or a converter script needs to be written. (02)
> (b) can we use the protege version to help us get to some of the less
> expressive representations (e.g. UML diagrams, XML/schemas, ...) (03)
You could be able to save it to UML 1.4 with the UML backend, but
again the UML backend is not prepared to handle your system classes
correctly (and may have other limitations). If there are PAL
constraints
in this, then it gets worse. (04)
> 3. Would you be able to join us at the call this Wednesday? (ref:
> http://ontolog.cim3.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?ConferenceCall_2004_11_24) (05)
Sorry, there is just too much going on in the moment. Without any
formal excuse to work on that I will not be able to look deep into
this issue. It would certainly be interesting to implement SCL
support for Protege, but without funding there is nothing I can do. (06)
Holger (07)
_________________________________________________________________
To Post: mailto:cctont-imp@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Msg Archives: http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/cctont-imp/
Community Wiki: http://ontolog.cim3.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?CctRepresentation
Community Files: http://ontolog.cim3.net/file/work/CCT-Representation/
Community Portal: http://ontolog.cim3.net/ (08)
|