Alan, (01)
Great! So, same question (while we look forward to hearing from Sue,
still): (02)
"Is there a set of such controlled vocabulary and their English
definitions, either published or in the form of working documents from
TBG17, that you could provide us to use as a reference?" (03)
Thanks. -ppy
-- (04)
Alan.Stitzer@xxxxxxxxx wrote Thu, 17 Jun 2004 17:08:15 -0400: (05)
> Garret,
>
> I believe in addition to TC154, the main thrust of the controlled
> vocabulary is actually TBG17
>
> ____________________
> Alan Stitzer
> AVP
> Marsh USA Inc.
> 1166 Avenue of the Americas
> New York, NY 10036-2774
> Phone: (561) 743-1938
> Fax: (561) 743-1993
> Internet: Alan.Stitzer@xxxxxxxxx
> ____________________ (06)
> <<< Memo from Garret.Minakawa@xxxxxxxxxx@Internet on 17 June, 2004,
> 04:12:02 PM Thursday >>>
>
>
> Garret.Minakawa@xxxxxxxxxx@Internet on 17 Jun 2004, 16:12 Thursday
>
> Please respond to cctont-imp@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx@Internet
>
> Sent by cctont-imp-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
>
> To: cctont-imp
> cc: (bcc: Alan Stitzer)
> Subject: Re: [cctont-imp] Re: Business/eBusiness Controlled Vocabulary -
> English Definitions
>
>
> Peter,
>
> The controlled vocabulary Sue is working on is part of TC154. I have a
> somewhat dated copy of the work but don't feel comfortable releasing it
> without Sue's approval since I
> don't know the status of the version I received.
>
> Sue is definitely the best person to provide additional detail and status
> of this project as well as provide a copy of the work if it is available
> for public consumption.
>
> garret (07)
> "Monica J. Martin" wrote:
>
>
>>Peter Yim wrote:
>>
>>
>>>In the course of developing our ontology, we should be referencing
>>>adopted standard definitions in our work as much as we can.
>>>
>>>Could anyone on this list suggest/offer resources on the "official"
>>>(or defacto) English definitions of business terms.
>>>
>>>... In particular,
>>>
>>>Sue, I remember you were working on (or have access to) a set of such
>>>controlled vocabulary and their definitions. Is there something you
>>>could provide us to use as a reference?
>>>
>>>Garret, at our 2004.06.15 meeting, you mentioned that there is a ISO
>>>TC 154 group working on this. Is this the same effort that Sue is
>>>working on, or a different initiative? Any resource you can point us
>
> to?
>
>>>Monica, I went back to an earlier discussion
>>>
>
>
>http://ontolog.cim3.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl/wiki.pl?ConferenceCall_2004_03_18#nid062
>
>
>>>which led to
>>>http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/ontolog-forum/2004-03/msg00041.html and
>>>then the link you shared:
>>>
>
>
>http://www.cenorm.be/cenorm/businessdomains/businessdomains/informationsocietystandardizationsystem/ebusiness+and+ecommerce/ebes+%28ebxml%29+workshop/forum_presentations.asp
>
>
>>>Somehow, the link doesn't work any more. Would you still have access
>>>to that resource; or, documents/standards relating to the subject
>>>matter that this presentation had pointer us to (if they are different
>>>from the two items (what Sue and/or the TC 154 people are working on).
>>>
>>>Anyone else?
>>>
>>>Thanks & regards. -ppy
>>>
>>
>>mm1: I think this is the correct link although I've not looked at it
>>very closely:
>>
>
>
>http://www.cenorm.be/cenorm/businessdomains/businessdomains/isss/activity/ecommerce+and+ebusiness.asp
>
>
>>Thanks. (08)
_________________________________________________________________
To Post: mailto:cctont-imp@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Msg Archives: http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/cctont-imp/
Community Wiki: http://ontolog.cim3.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?CctRepresentation
Community Files: http://ontolog.cim3.net/file/work/CCT-Representation/
Community Portal: http://ontolog.cim3.net/ (09)
|