|
Folks,
I can't make Saturday, but I am available for Monday's call.
My last email is a report on the St Mary's progress.
David Coggeshal
SFC MapLab Project
415 387-8760
-----Original Message-----
From: Michelle Raymond <michellearaymond@xxxxxxxxx>
To: bsp-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx <bsp-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Deborah MacPherson <debmacp@xxxxxxxxx>; MacPherson, Deborah <dmacpherson@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Michelle Raymond <michellearaymond@xxxxxxxxx>; David Coggeshall <ibcomm@xxxxxxx>; Rex Brooks <rexb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: steve@xxxxxxxxxxx; Peter Yim <peter.yim@xxxxxxxx>; Alan Vinh <alan.vinh@xxxxxxxx>
Sent: Fri, 3 Apr 2009 1:48 pm
Subject: Re: [bsp-forum] Fwd: Re: Advocate the OFPD Project
To all potential participants:
Following on Deborah's and Rex's meeting suggestion,
below is a proposal to meet Saturday 10am Pacific/ 1pm Eastern.
Best regards,
Michelle
Meeting proposal
-------------------------
Suggested start time: 10am Pacific, 1pm Eastern
Likely duration: 1 1/2 hours
Connection: (will check for use of Ontolog meeting line)
* Purpose: Preparation for OntologySummit2009
presentation/discussion (Project work, both current and proposed, for
presentation at OntologySummit2009)
* (Working) Short name: Ontology across Building, Emergency, and
Energy Standards
* (Working) Long name: Ontology and tools for integration of
building, emergency management, and energy management standards for
cross-domain information exchange and representation.
Proposed meeting placeholder page: ConferenceCall_2009_04_04 (linked
from http://ontolog.cim3.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?BuildingServicePerformance)
> The key Emergency-specific standards which will include an
> ontological representation that will be updated (versioned) over time
> is the OASIS Emergency Data Exchange Language Reference Information
> Model (EDXL-RIM).
>
> EDXL-RIM is intended to formalize the ontological foundation as well
> as controlled vocabularies for all EDXL Standards.
>
> It is envisioned to be produced in discrete modules which allows the
> OASIS Emergency Management Technical Committee's EDXL-RIM Subcomittee
> to work on smaller units than a larger, overarching and comprehensive
> document.
>
> The first unit will focus on EDXL-DE and the ValueListURN concept
> that allows any published and maintained list (taxonomy or
> terminology) to be used to specify such items as Event (or Incident)
> Types, Organizational Roles and Responsibilities, Equipment and
> Facilities names and descriptions.
>
> EDXL-RIM is taken from and abstracted from the EDXL family of
> Standards that currently includes:
> EDXL-Disribution Element ( EDXL-DE) for packaging and routing
> emergency messages;
> EDXL-Hospital AVailability Exchange (EDXL-HAVE) for standard
> hospital system (emergency) status report messages;
> EDXL-Resource Messaging (EDXL-RM) for the exchange of
> emergency logistics information messages.
>
> Prospective new EDXL Submissions for developing Standards:
> EDXL-Situation Reporting (EDXL-SR) for situation report
> messages (submission process underway); and,
> EDXL-Emergency Patient Tracking (EDXL-EPT) to provide
> emergency patient identity information exchange.
>
> Cheers,
> Rex
>
>>>>Date: Fri, 3 Apr 2009 08:36:26 -0400
>>>>Subject: Re: Advocate the OFPD Project
>> >>From: Deborah MacPherson <debmacp@xxxxxxxxx>
>>>>To: Steve Ray <steve@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>>>>Cc: Peter Yim <peter.yim@xxxxxxxx>, Michelle Raymond
>>>><michellearaymond@xxxxxxxxx>,
>>>> David Coggeshall <ibcomm@xxxxxxx>, Rex Brooks <rexb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>>>X-Nonspam: Statistical 63%
>>>>
>>>>Thanks very much Steve. 10 minutes will be no problem, I'll do 5 then
>>>>hand it over to Michelle. If a Firefox connection is available maybe
>>>>David and Rex can remotely show some demos to respond to questions.
>>>>Thanks again.
>>>>
>>>>On Thu, Apr 2, 2009 at 10:50 PM, Steve Ray
>>>><<mailto:steve@xxxxxxxxxxx>steve@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>OK. Let's do it. I have updated the agenda page. My only request is
>>>>that you try to keep the presentation part to 10 minutes to allow 10
>>>>minutes of questions and discussion. It sounds good and real. Thanks.
>>>>
>>>>- Steve
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>On Thu, Apr 2, 2009 at 8:41 PM, Deborah MacPherson
>>>><<mailto:debmacp@xxxxxxxxx>debmacp@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>And I you. Everyone is learning from everyone now. Lets make hay while
>>>>the sun shines with Obama in office.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>On Thu, Apr 2, 2009 at 8:39 PM, Peter Yim
>>>><<mailto:peter.yim@xxxxxxxx>peter.yim@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>Thank you Deborah. Michelle, David & Rex.
>>>>
>>>>Steve runs the summit workshop agenda ... so I'll defer to him on the
>>>>decision related to that.
>>>>
>>>>Personally, I would love to see where "ontology" fits into your
>>>>overall plan (which I guess you have inferred), but more specifically,
>>>>what is being envisioned -- what ontology(ies) or ontology-based
>>>>standard(s) will emerge from this project, how will they be
>> >>implemented (language to be used, association with existing
>>>>ontology(ies) or foundation ontology(ies), etc.) and how those
>>>>ontologies/standards will be applied ... and so on.
>>>>
>>>>Thanks in advance for sharing your ideas and insight with us. I look
>>>>forward to learning from your work.
>>>>
>>>>Regards. =ppy
>>>>--
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>On Thu, Apr 2, 2009 at 4:24 PM, Deborah MacPherson
>>>><<mailto:debmacp@xxxxxxxxx>debmacp@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>>> Dear Peter and Steve,
>>>>>
>>>>> This message is to frankly request the opportunity to support the
>>> >> Building Service Performance / Integrated Response Service
>>>>> Consortium to talk about the Open Floor Plan Display Project as a
>>>>> concrete candidate in the New Ideas portion of the Summit.
>>>>>
>>>>> I can present a 10 to 20 minute background statement, landing
>>>>>where
>>>>> Building Information Modeling standards really are. Michelle can
>>>>> follow up (either in person or remotely) to explain the technical
>>>>>data integration challenges.
>>>>> Once we can get to EXPRESS and incorporate OmniClass, the battle
>>>>>is
>>>>> won, this system will work.
>>>>>
>>>>> There is something important that David Coggeshall has identified
>>>>> in using
>>>>> W3 standards SVG, AJAX and _javascript_ to exchange the bare minimum
>>>>> information required by real buildings and real fire departments
>>>>> today versus the IFCs which will work some day in the future. If
>>>>> Rex and Michelle and other Summit participants can take the
>>>>> display and naming conventions one step further, most likely also
>>>>> in collaboration with the OmniClass development committee and OGC,
>>>>> it truly is a project that could be delivered
>>>> > in the next year. This project should be supported. It will work.
>>>> The whole
>>>>> building and emergency response industry really needs to be able
>>>>>to
>>>>> use the IFCs, IFD, EXPRESS, and STEP geometry. Most practitioners
>>>>> such as myself will greatly appreciate being able to work with
>>>>>what
>>>>> David has already created with smart polygons and the Common
>>>>>Operating Picture.
>>>>>
>>>>> Sincerely,
>>>>>
>>>>> Deborah
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> ********************************************************
>>>>>
>>>>> Deborah L. MacPherson CSI CCS, AIA
>>>>> Specifications and Research Cannon Design Projects Director,
>>>>> Accuracy&Aesthetics
_________________________________________________________________
Message Archives: http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/bsp-forum/
Subscribe: mailto:bsp-forum-join@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Config/Unsubscribe: http://ontolog.cim3.net/mailman/listinfo/bsp-forum/
Shared Files: http://ontolog.cim3.net/file/work/BSP/
Wiki: http://ontolog.cim3.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?BuildingServicePerformance (01)
|