bsp-forum
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [bsp-forum] Fwd: Re: Advocate the OFPD Project

To: "bsp-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <bsp-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Deborah MacPherson <debmacp@xxxxxxxxx>, "MacPherson, Deborah" <dmacpherson@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Michelle Raymond <michellearaymond@xxxxxxxxx>, David Coggeshall <ibcomm@xxxxxxx>, Rex Brooks <rexb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: steve@xxxxxxxxxxx
From: Michelle Raymond <michellearaymond@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 3 Apr 2009 15:48:35 -0500
Message-id: <f8e7bfd30904031348l2873157cse0f1060eb79a0629@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To all potential participants:    (01)

Following on Deborah's and Rex's meeting suggestion,
below is a proposal to meet Saturday 10am Pacific/ 1pm Eastern.    (02)

Best regards,
Michelle    (03)

Meeting proposal
-------------------------
Suggested start time: 10am Pacific, 1pm Eastern
Likely duration: 1 1/2 hours
Connection: (will check for use of Ontolog meeting line)    (04)

    * Purpose: Preparation for OntologySummit2009
presentation/discussion  (Project work, both current and proposed, for
presentation at OntologySummit2009)
    * (Working) Short name: Ontology across Building, Emergency, and
Energy Standards
    * (Working) Long name: Ontology and tools for integration of
building, emergency management, and energy management standards for
cross-domain information exchange and representation.    (05)

Proposed meeting placeholder page: ConferenceCall_2009_04_04  (linked
from http://ontolog.cim3.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?BuildingServicePerformance)    (06)



> The key Emergency-specific standards which will include an
> ontological representation that will be updated (versioned) over time
> is the OASIS Emergency Data Exchange Language Reference Information
> Model (EDXL-RIM).
>
> EDXL-RIM is intended to formalize the ontological foundation as well
> as controlled vocabularies for all EDXL Standards.
>
> It is envisioned to be produced in discrete modules which allows the
> OASIS Emergency Management Technical Committee's EDXL-RIM Subcomittee
> to work on smaller units than a larger, overarching and comprehensive
> document.
>
> The first unit will focus on EDXL-DE and the ValueListURN concept
> that allows any published and maintained list (taxonomy or
> terminology) to be used to specify such items as Event (or Incident)
> Types, Organizational Roles and Responsibilities, Equipment and
> Facilities names and descriptions.
>
> EDXL-RIM is taken from and abstracted from the EDXL family of
> Standards that currently includes:
>        EDXL-Disribution Element ( EDXL-DE) for packaging and routing
> emergency messages;
>        EDXL-Hospital AVailability Exchange (EDXL-HAVE) for standard
> hospital system (emergency) status report messages;
>        EDXL-Resource Messaging (EDXL-RM) for the exchange of
> emergency logistics information messages.
>
> Prospective new EDXL Submissions for developing Standards:
>        EDXL-Situation Reporting (EDXL-SR) for situation report
> messages (submission process underway); and,
>        EDXL-Emergency Patient Tracking (EDXL-EPT) to provide
> emergency patient identity information exchange.
>
> Cheers,
> Rex
>
>>>>Date: Fri, 3 Apr 2009 08:36:26 -0400
>>>>Subject: Re: Advocate the OFPD Project
>>  >>From: Deborah MacPherson <debmacp@xxxxxxxxx>
>>>>To: Steve Ray <steve@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>>>>Cc: Peter Yim <peter.yim@xxxxxxxx>, Michelle Raymond
>>>><michellearaymond@xxxxxxxxx>,
>>>>     David Coggeshall <ibcomm@xxxxxxx>, Rex Brooks <rexb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>>>X-Nonspam: Statistical 63%
>>>>
>>>>Thanks very much Steve. 10 minutes will be no problem, I'll do 5 then
>>>>hand it over to Michelle. If a Firefox connection is available maybe
>>>>David and Rex can remotely show some demos to respond to questions.
>>>>Thanks again.
>>>>
>>>>On Thu, Apr 2, 2009 at 10:50 PM, Steve Ray
>>>><<mailto:steve@xxxxxxxxxxx>steve@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>OK. Let's do it. I have updated the agenda page. My only request is
>>>>that you try to keep the presentation part to 10 minutes to allow 10
>>>>minutes of questions and discussion. It sounds good and real. Thanks.
>>>>
>>>>- Steve
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>On Thu, Apr 2, 2009 at 8:41 PM, Deborah MacPherson
>>>><<mailto:debmacp@xxxxxxxxx>debmacp@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>And I you. Everyone is learning from everyone now. Lets make hay while
>>>>the sun shines with Obama in office.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>On Thu, Apr 2, 2009 at 8:39 PM, Peter Yim
>>>><<mailto:peter.yim@xxxxxxxx>peter.yim@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>Thank you Deborah. Michelle, David & Rex.
>>>>
>>>>Steve runs the summit workshop agenda ... so I'll defer to him on the
>>>>decision related to that.
>>>>
>>>>Personally, I would love to see where "ontology" fits into your
>>>>overall plan (which I guess you have inferred), but more specifically,
>>>>what is being envisioned -- what ontology(ies) or ontology-based
>>>>standard(s) will emerge from this project, how will they be
>>  >>implemented (language to be used, association with existing
>>>>ontology(ies) or foundation ontology(ies), etc.) and how those
>>>>ontologies/standards will be applied ... and so on.
>>>>
>>>>Thanks in advance for sharing your ideas and insight with us. I look
>>>>forward to learning from your work.
>>>>
>>>>Regards.  =ppy
>>>>--
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>On Thu, Apr 2, 2009 at 4:24 PM, Deborah MacPherson
>>>><<mailto:debmacp@xxxxxxxxx>debmacp@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>>>    Dear Peter and Steve,
>>>>>
>>>>>    This message is to frankly request the opportunity to support the
>>>   >> Building  Service Performance / Integrated Response Service
>>>>>   Consortium to talk about  the Open Floor Plan Display Project as a
>>>>>  concrete candidate in the New Ideas  portion of the Summit.
>>>>>
>>>>>    I can present a 10 to 20 minute background statement, landing
>>>>>where
>>>>>   Building  Information Modeling standards really are. Michelle can
>>>>>   follow up (either in  person or remotely) to explain the technical
>>>>>data integration challenges.
>>>>>    Once we can get to EXPRESS and incorporate OmniClass, the battle
>>>>>is
>>>>>   won,  this system will work.
>>>>>
>>>>>    There is something important that David Coggeshall has identified
>>>>>  in  using
>>>>>    W3 standards SVG, AJAX and JavaScript to exchange the bare minimum
>>>>>  information required by real buildings and real fire departments
>>>>>  today  versus the IFCs which will work some day in the future. If
>>>>>  Rex  and Michelle  and other Summit participants can take the
>>>>>  display and  naming conventions  one step further, most likely also
>>>>>  in  collaboration with the OmniClass  development committee and OGC,
>>>>>  it  truly is a project that could be delivered
>>>>    > in the next year. This project should be supported. It will work.
>>>>   The whole
>>>>>    building and emergency response industry really needs to be able
>>>>>to
>>>>>   use the  IFCs, IFD, EXPRESS, and STEP geometry. Most practitioners
>>>>>   such as myself  will greatly appreciate being able to work with
>>>>>what
>>>>>   David has already  created with smart polygons and the Common
>>>>>Operating Picture.
>>>>>
>>>>>    Sincerely,
>>>>>
>>>>>    Deborah
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>    --
>>>>>    ********************************************************
>>>>>
>>>>>    Deborah L. MacPherson CSI CCS, AIA
>>>>>    Specifications and Research Cannon Design  Projects Director,
>>>>>  Accuracy&Aesthetics    (07)

_________________________________________________________________
Message Archives: http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/bsp-forum/   
Subscribe: mailto:bsp-forum-join@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx 
Config/Unsubscribe: http://ontolog.cim3.net/mailman/listinfo/bsp-forum/  
Shared Files: http://ontolog.cim3.net/file/work/BSP/ 
Wiki: http://ontolog.cim3.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?BuildingServicePerformance    (08)
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>