Folks, (01)
I have created the workspace for the Building Service Performance
(BSP) project. This include the [bsp-ofrum] discussion list, the
OntologWiki:BuildingServicePerformance project homepage, as well as
the various shared file workspace. (02)
I have subscribed everyone to the [bsp-ofrum] list too. (03)
For those unfamiliar with access to the shared file workspace on our
WebDAV server, please refer to:
http://ontolog.cim3.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?ToolsCollaboration#nidAVL (04)
Feel free to contact me if there is any question. (05)
All the best with the project! (06)
Regards. =ppy (07)
P.S. See: http://ontolog.cim3.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?WikiHomePage#nid1DRH
-- (08)
On Fri, Apr 11, 2008 at 12:51 PM, Peter Yim <peter.yim@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Thanks ... team! I'll get your CWE-workspace set up later today.
>
> To segun_alayande: I don't have you as a member of the Ontolog
> community yet ... would you take a look at our membership information
> (see: http://ontolog.cim3.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?WikiHomePage#nid1J ) and
> come join us (if what we do at Ontolog aligns well with your
> professional interest,) so we could list you as a member of the
> founding team.
>
>
> Thanks & regards. =ppy
> -- (09)
> On Fri, Apr 11, 2008 at 12:00 PM, Considine, Toby (Campus Services IT)
>
>
> <Toby.Considine@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> > I have just been on the phone with Bob and Deborah, in series. I was
>trying to align the Deborah's Building Purpose Classification with my own
>interest in defining a Building Service Provisioning Framework. After some
>arm-wrestling, Deborah and I have come up with:
> >
> > BuildingServicePerformance - an Ontolog project to formalize how we
>describe the Purpose(s) of a Facility and the associated services expected
>from the building systems. We hope to include the beginning of a compliance
>framework as well, that is, how to understand if the service is being provided
>in accord with required performance metrics.
> >
> > We clearly do not intend to write the metrics, but we believe the
>framework will allow others to formalize the metrics require for different
>scenarios pretty quickly.
> >
> > A measure of success would be that the framework can be used to generate
>IDMs to at last create information bridges between building systems and
>buildingSmart, although that is not the only use we see.
> >
> > Bob want us to begin fleshing out the wiki to define this part of the
>project soon.
> >
> > tc
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > "When one door closes, another opens; but we often look so long and so
>regretfully upon the closed door that we do not see the one which has opened
>for us." -- Alexander Graham Bell
> >
> > Toby Considine
> > Chair, OASIS oBIX TC
> > Facilities Technology Office
> > University of North Carolina
> > Chapel Hill, NC
> >
> > Email: Toby.Considine@ unc.edu
> > Phone: (919)962-9073
> > http://www.oasis-open.org
> > blog: www.NewDaedalus.com (010)
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: peter.yim@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:peter.yim@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Peter
>Yim
> >
> >
> > Sent: Friday, April 11, 2008 2:26 PM
> > To: Bob Smith; Deborah MacPherson; Considine, Toby (Campus Services IT);
>segun_alayande@xxxxxxx; Rex Brooks; Michelle Raymond
> > Cc: James Bryce Clark; Peter Yim
> > Subject: Re: FW: I'd like to set up an Ontolog project
> >
> > Thank you Deborah and Bob.
> >
> > Sounds great! I can see we have 6 proponents here (I assume everyone
> > on this routing, except perhaps for Jamie and I are in ... let me know
> > otherwise.) More than 3 (the minimum) is obviously a good sign!
> >
> > ... the team will need to adopt this charter at your "organizing"
> > meeting anyway. What I needed quickly, to allow my setting up a
> > CWE-workspace for the team, is a "name of the project" and possibly an
> > acronym.
> >
> > Can we get proposal(s) and then consensus on those (name and acronym)
>please.
> >
> > Thanks. =ppy
> > -- (011)
> > On Fri, Apr 11, 2008 at 10:36 AM, Bob Smith <bob@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > Hi Peter,
> > >
> > > Thanks for your help in setting the format:
> > >
> > > This New Project has a Mission Statement crafted by Deborah,
> > > And thus a name should thus be easier to develop by the conveners:
> > >
> > > So the three names:
> > >
> > > 1.
> > > 2.
> > > 3. Bob Smith
> > >
> > >
> > > ======================================
> > >
> > > MISSION STATEMENT:
> > > DM> The statement could be along the lines of:
> > > (012)
> > > "To reach global consensus on building classification types for:
> > > Emergency Response
> > > Local Jurisdiction Planning and Management
> > > Architectural Documentation
> > > Ontology Management across Domains
> > > Bringing together researchers working on the same problem without
>realizing
> > > it. (013)
> > > PURPOSE:
> > > DM> The purpose is to design and demonstrate a variety of techniques
>to get
> > >
> > > physical space and semantic space to stay connected. The first attempt
>will
> > > utilize Onuma Planning System in a series of BIMstorms and subsequent
> > > technologies to be determined as the problem becomes better defined."
> > >
> > > The statement may be able to be amended after the 21st if the
>International
> > > Code Council is interested in participating. (I'm going to talk with
>them
> > > that day about the fire stations)
> > >
> > > STATEMENT of WORK: (To be discussed relative to Mission Statement,
>Above)
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > ==================
> > >
> > > Thoughts?
> > >
> > > Cheers,
> > >
> > > Bob (014)
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: peter.yim@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:peter.yim@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of
>Peter
> > > Yim
> > > Sent: Wednesday, April 09, 2008 9:46 AM
> > > To: Considine, Toby (Campus Services IT); Deborah MacPherson; Bob Smith
> > > Cc: segun_alayande@xxxxxxx; Rex Brooks; Michelle Raymond; James Bryce
>Clark
> > > Subject: Re: FW: I'd like to set up an Ontolog project
> > >
> > > Toby, Deborah, Bob, et al.,
> > >
> > > Rather than continuing to transact over this email shortlist, may I
> > > suggest you guys take one step back, form a "project" first, so that
> > > we can get the infrastructure in place so we can get all these
> > > exchanges captured and archived.
> > >
> > > We just need a project name, at least 3 proponents, a charter, and a
> > > open conference call for planning/constitution/organization/kick-off
> > > date.
> > >
> > > I can even get things started (mailing list, wiki page, etc.) if
> > > someone* can propose a name and then get it adopted by the folks here.
> > > ...
> > >
> > > Thanks & regards. =ppy
> > > -- (015)
_________________________________________________________________
Message Archives: http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/bsp-forum/
Subscribe: mailto:bsp-forum-join@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Config/Unsubscribe: http://ontolog.cim3.net/mailman/listinfo/bsp-forum/
Shared Files: http://ontolog.cim3.net/file/work/BSP/
Wiki: http://ontolog.cim3.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?BuildingServicePerformance (016)
|