Mills has been one of the very few who have focused on
the business value of ontologies and semantic technologies, and his
perspective/message is important.
He has been interacting with Doug Lenat since yesterday to
craft a sound message, and this will continue through Wed.
By the way, I am not an apologist: I just think there is
real value in having someone describe the business potential/necessity for our
technologies.
Thanks,
Leo
_____________________________________________ Dr. Leo
Obrst The MITRE Corporation, Information
Semantics lobrst@xxxxxxxxx Center for Innovative
Computing & Informatics Voice: 703-983-6770 7515 Colshire
Drive, M/S H305 Fax: 703-983-1379 McLean, VA
22102-7508, USA
I wrote:
I don't think Mill's piece is SO bad, he clearly
has a vague idea of upper-level ontologies, a vaguer idea of axiomatic
ontologies, and is definitely against common UO. Explaining him the role of
axiomatic ontologies is probably more important than convincing him on the
utility of a common ontology....
...in addition, he points the
role of evaluation, which is something we should explicitly address in our
meeting.
Nicola
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Nicola Guarino
Co-Editor in Chief, Applied Ontology (IOS
Press)
Head, Laboratory for Applied Ontology (LOA), ISTC-CNR
Institute for Cognitive Sciences and Technologies
National Research Council
Via Solteri, 38
I-38100 Trento
phone: +39 0461 828486
secretary: +39 0461 436641
fax: +39 0461 435344
|