What about: (01)
"Mapping local conceptual schemes [or ontologies, if you prefer] to
a common upper ontology is the most cost-effective method for
achieving scalable semantic interoperability." (02)
Nicola (03)
On Mar 2, 2006, at 11:47 AM, West, Matthew R SIPC-DFD/321 wrote: (04)
> Dear Pat,
>
> OK getting picky now.
>
> A CUO is not a method...
>
> Regards
>
> Matthew
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: uos-convene-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> [mailto:uos-convene-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]On Behalf Of Cassidy,
>> Patrick J.
>> Sent: 01 March 2006 15:08
>> To: Upper Ontology Summit convention
>> Subject: RE: [uos-convene] Other Approaches Too
>>
>>
>> OK, try again:
>>
>> "A common upper ontology is the most cost-effective method for
>> achieving scalable semantic interoperability."
>>
>> We can maintain a commentary on the UOS Wiki where individuals so
>> inclined can provide their interpretations of the various words in
>> the
>> statement, which would make that statement true in their view. That
>> would be a public place to express reservations.
>>
>> e.g. My first comment on "cost-effective" might be: "cost-effective
>> by a wide margin over any other technique that has been proposed"
>>
>> Pat
>>
>> Patrick Cassidy
>> MITRE Corporation
>> 260 Industrial Way
>> Eatontown, NJ 07724
>> Mail Stop: MNJE
>> Phone: 732-578-6340
>> Cell: 908-565-4053
>> Fax: 732-578-6012
>> Email: pcassidy@xxxxxxxxx
>>
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: uos-convene-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> [mailto:uos-convene-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Bill
>> Andersen
>> Sent: Wednesday, March 01, 2006 9:20 AM
>> To: Upper Ontology Summit convention
>> Subject: Re: [uos-convene] Other Approaches Too.
>>
>> Thanks, Matthew...
>>
>> You know. I should read my own posts. What's wrong with saying
>> ROI? When we're talking about building computer systems and not
>> philosophy, that *is* what we're talking about in the end. Thanks
>> again.
>>
>> Shall we put this alongside the existing wording and see
>> which people
>> like better?
>>
>> .bill
>>
>> On Mar 1, 2006, at 04:14 , West, Matthew R SIPC-DFD/321 wrote:
>>
>>> Dear Bill,
>>>
>>> You say:
>>>
>>>> The point here is that the ROI from using ULO for both domain
>>>> ontology construction and for integration is higher than similar
>>>> attempts undertaken without ULO.
>>>
>>> I agree.
>>>
>>> I think this is what we really want to say, rather than whether it
>>> is essential or indeispensible. It is a simple economic argument
>>> that ought to be listened to by potential funders.
>>>
>>>
>>> Regards
>>>
>>> Matthew West
>>> Reference Data Architecture and Standards Manager
>>> Shell International Petroleum Company Limited
>>> Shell Centre, London SE1 7NA, United Kingdom
>>>
>>> Tel: +44 20 7934 4490 Mobile: +44 7796 336538
>>> Email: matthew.west@xxxxxxxxx
>>> http://www.shell.com
>>> http://www.matthew-west.org.uk/
>>>
>>>
>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>> From: uos-convene-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>> [mailto:uos-convene-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]On Behalf Of
>>>> Bill Andersen
>>>> Sent: 28 February 2006 23:47
>>>> To: Upper Ontology Summit convention
>>>> Subject: Re: [uos-convene] Other Approaches Too.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Hey Mike,
>>>>
>>>> See below.
>>>>
>>>> On Feb 28, 2006, at 18:31 , Uschold, Michael F wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> To the extent that 'Indispensable' is a semantic dead-ringer for
>>>>> 'essential', this suggestion amounts to changing 'essential' to
>>>>> 'increasingly essential'.
>>>>>
>>>>> Also, indispensable and essential are pretty black and white
>>>>> concepts, Either it is or it is not.
>>>>>
>>>>> It is not clear what 'increasingly essential's means. Nearer to a
>>>>> state of being essential, crossing that b/w divide?
>>>>>
>>>>> The more I think about it, the more I'm ok with the other wording,
>>>>> by I forget who.
>>>>>
>>>>> Something like "essential for affordable and ... semantic
>>>>> interoperability"
>>>>>
>>>>> This is less controversial.
>>>>
>>>> I'm not certain that "less controversial" is something we
>>>> ought to be
>>>> shooting for. The very position that ULO brings something
>>>> qualitatively different to building and successfully employing
>>>> ontologies is what's being assumed in this forum by its
>>>> participants. I don't know about the other "public" participants,
>>>> but we at Ontology Works have had much success applying our ULO and
>>>> Barry Smith documents similar success:
>>>>
>>>> Jonathan Simon, James Matthew Fielding and Barry Smith, "Using
>>>> Philosophy to Improve the Coherence and Interoperability of
>>>> Applications Ontologies: A Field Report on the Collaboration of
>>>> IFOMIS and L&C", in Gregor Büchel, Bertin Klein and Thomas Roth-
>>>> Berghofer (eds.), Proceedings of the First Workshop on
>>>> Philosophy and
>>>> Informatics. Deutsches Forschungszentrum für künstliche
>> Intelligenz,
>>>> Cologne: 2004, 65-72.
>>>> http://ontology.buffalo.edu/medo/FOBKSI.pdf
>>>>
>>>> The point here is that the ROI from using ULO for both domain
>>>> ontology construction and for integration is higher than similar
>>>> attempts undertaken without ULO. Thus, I don't think Barry's
>>>> wording
>>>> is too strong at all. I would dare say that the onus is on
>>>> those who
>>>> advocate some other path to show that ULO does not have these
>>>> differential ROI benefits. To do that, they would have to say how
>>>> they, without ULO, would have reproduced all the same results - and
>>>> at less cost. Such trade studies are sadly lacking.
>>>>
>>>> .bill
>>>> _________________________________________________________________
>>>> Message Archives: http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/uos-convene/
>>>> To Post: mailto:uos-convene@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>> Community Portal: http://ontolog.cim3.net/
>>>> Shared Files:
>>>> http://ontolog.cim3.net/file/work/UpperOntologySummit/uos-convene/
>>>> Community Wiki:
>>>> http://ontolog.cim3.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?UpperOntologySummit
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>> _________________________________________________________________
>>> Message Archives: http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/uos-convene/
>>> To Post: mailto:uos-convene@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>> Community Portal: http://ontolog.cim3.net/
>>> Shared Files:
> http://ontolog.cim3.net/file/work/UpperOntologySummit/
>> uos-convene/
>> Community Wiki: http://ontolog.cim3.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?
>> UpperOntologySummit
>>
>
> Bill Andersen (andersen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx)
> Chief Scientist
> Ontology Works, Inc. (www.ontologyworks.com)
> 3600 O'Donnell Street, Suite 600
> Baltimore, MD 21224
> Office: 410-675-1201
> Cell: 443-858-6444
>
>
> _________________________________________________________________
> Message Archives: http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/uos-convene/
> To Post: mailto:uos-convene@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Community Portal: http://ontolog.cim3.net/
> Shared Files:
> http://ontolog.cim3.net/file/work/UpperOntologySummit/uos-convene/
> Community Wiki:
> http://ontolog.cim3.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?UpperOntologySummit
> _________________________________________________________________
> Message Archives: http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/uos-convene/
> To Post: mailto:uos-convene@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Community Portal: http://ontolog.cim3.net/
> Shared Files: http://ontolog.cim3.net/file/work/UpperOntologySummit/
> uos-convene/
> Community Wiki: http://ontolog.cim3.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?
> UpperOntologySummit
>
>
> _________________________________________________________________
> Message Archives: http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/uos-convene/
> To Post: mailto:uos-convene@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Community Portal: http://ontolog.cim3.net/
> Shared Files: http://ontolog.cim3.net/file/work/UpperOntologySummit/
> uos-convene/
> Community Wiki: http://ontolog.cim3.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?
> UpperOntologySummit
> (05)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
-----
Nicola Guarino
Co-Editor in Chief, Applied Ontology (IOS Press)
Head, Laboratory for Applied Ontology (LOA), ISTC-CNR
Institute for Cognitive Sciences and Technologies
National Research Council
Via Solteri, 38
I-38100 Trento (06)
phone: +39 0461 828486
secretary: +39 0461 436641
fax: +39 0461 435344
email: guarino@xxxxxxxxxx
web site: http://www.loa-cnr.it (07)
_________________________________________________________________
Message Archives: http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/uos-convene/
To Post: mailto:uos-convene@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Community Portal: http://ontolog.cim3.net/
Shared Files: http://ontolog.cim3.net/file/work/UpperOntologySummit/uos-convene/
Community Wiki: http://ontolog.cim3.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?UpperOntologySummit (08)
|