On Jul 18, 2009, at 2:58 PM, Dave McComb wrote: (01)
> I could get started with level 0. I must admit though every use
> case I can think of involves a unit and a value. (02)
Yes, but many "partially semantic systems" need an ontology for naming
the units, but they can supply their own values without using an
ontology (thank you very much :->). Having a widely agreed units
ontology would be a big step, if it isn't too opaque. (03)
john (04)
_________________________________________________________________
Message Archives: http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/uom-ontology-std/
Subscribe: mailto:uom-ontology-std-join@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Config/Unsubscribe: http://ontolog.cim3.net/mailman/listinfo/uom-ontology-std/
Shared Files: http://ontolog.cim3.net/file/work/UoM/
Wiki: http://ontolog.cim3.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?UoM_Ontology_Standard (05)
|